Mail Archive Search: <+from:mark@sccaprepared.com>

Results:

References: [ +from:mark@sccaprepared.com: 119 ]

Total 119 documents matching your query.

41. Re: [evolution-disc.] Re: The ProSolo Driver's Manifesto (score: 1): Author: Mark Andy <mark@sccaprepared.com>; Date: Tue, 14 Dec 2004 21:03:46 -0500 (EST); Couple thoughts... You're aware of "Chrono Mode" on JAC's timer, right? It will recognize up to four signal trips that get dumped w/ a timestamp out the serial port. I think newer models have this b; /html/autox/2004-12/msg00055.html (7,680 bytes)
42. Re: [evolution-disc.] Re: Prepared proposal update (score: 1): Author: Mark Andy <mark@sccaprepared.com>; Date: Fri, 5 Nov 2004 10:52:12 -0500 (EST); No. Like the Fiat 850 and 948 spridget. The Lotus 7A could easily meet the lower weights. Mark; /html/autox/2004-11/msg00019.html (7,375 bytes)
43. Re: [evolution-disc.] Re: Prepared proposal update (score: 1): Author: Mark Andy <mark@sccaprepared.com>; Date: Fri, 5 Nov 2004 11:00:04 -0500 (EST); Multiplier would be 1.13, not 1.3... That would mean a 948cc Lotus 7A would need to weigh 1100 lbs (calculated weight of 1071 lbs), which is still 25 lbs less than currently required. Mark; /html/autox/2004-11/msg00020.html (8,218 bytes)
44. national schedule for '05? (score: 1): Author: Mark Andy <mark@sccaprepared.com>; Date: Fri, 5 Nov 2004 14:04:59 -0500 (EST); I'm getting started figuring out our local region's schedule, and was wondering if anyone could educate me on the east coast national schedule... In '04 it was: 05/29/2004 DC Tour 06/05/2004 DC Pro; /html/autox/2004-11/msg00021.html (6,885 bytes)
45. Re: [evolution-disc.] Re: Prepared proposal update (score: 1): Author: Mark Andy <mark@sccaprepared.com>; Date: Sat, 6 Nov 2004 23:25:17 -0500 (EST); SEB's proposal doesn't have the multivalve adder, so you'd be getting 200 lbs. Working off a semi accurate cheat sheet, assuming the SEB proposed formula for FP... Others gaining >=100 lbs: Acura NS; /html/autox/2004-11/msg00024.html (8,062 bytes)
46. Re: [evolution-disc.] Re: Prepared proposal update (score: 1): Author: Mark Andy <mark@sccaprepared.com>; Date: Sun, 7 Nov 2004 19:43:11 -0500 (EST); That may have been the august FT proposal. What he might have left out was that the SEB didn't want the multi-valve or vvt penalties. Per the Nov. Fastrack, what was put in front of the BOD the firs; /html/autox/2004-11/msg00026.html (9,544 bytes)
47. Re: Prepared proposal update (score: 1): Author: Mark Andy <mark@sccaprepared.com>; Date: Sun, 7 Nov 2004 23:01:04 -0500 (EST); I just can't read with this spreadsheet type so small. TR-8... :-) Mark; /html/autox/2004-11/msg00028.html (6,866 bytes)
48. Re: [evolution-disc.] Re: Prepared proposal update (score: 1): Author: Mark Andy <mark@sccaprepared.com>; Date: Mon, 8 Nov 2004 23:19:32 -0500 (EST); Ok. The issue I have with that is that your car is one particular car, vs. all the rest in the class. Leaving aside the actual validity of whatever formula, looking at only one car (ok, two if you i; /html/autox/2004-11/msg00038.html (11,311 bytes)
49. Re: Potential new helmet rule would affect autocrossers (score: 1): Author: Mark Andy <mark@sccaprepared.com>; Date: Thu, 18 Nov 2004 11:31:59 -0500 (EST); Go read the report before you happily kowtow to the company line. That said, I don't know where you can (properly) get a copy of the report. The one I have (which I will not redistribute since I don; /html/autox/2004-11/msg00084.html (10,915 bytes)
50. annual tech and online rules? (score: 1): Author: Mark Andy <mark@sccaprepared.com>; Date: Mon, 22 Nov 2004 22:45:53 -0500 (EST); What's the feeling about the upcoming online rules and the 3.3.3.A.3 requirement that competitor must posses a copy of the rules? In the past, we required a rulebook and that (plus a tech sticker th; /html/autox/2004-11/msg00150.html (7,907 bytes)
51. Re: annual tech and online rules? (score: 1): Author: Mark Andy <mark@sccaprepared.com>; Date: Tue, 23 Nov 2004 08:55:00 -0500 (EST); I'm not talking about national or divisional events though, I'm talking about complying with the regulations regarding annual tech. Mark; /html/autox/2004-11/msg00153.html (8,071 bytes)
52. RE: [evolution-disc.] annual tech and online rules? (score: 1): Author: Mark Andy <mark@sccaprepared.com>; Date: Tue, 23 Nov 2004 09:54:19 -0500 (EST); Well, given that my original question quoted that section as well, it didn't seem to answer it, at least for me. Let me make it more clear... Is a printed copy of the rules from the website good eno; /html/autox/2004-11/msg00155.html (8,755 bytes)
53. RE: [evolution-disc.] annual tech and online rules? (score: 1): Author: Mark Andy <mark@sccaprepared.com>; Date: Tue, 23 Nov 2004 10:33:59 -0500 (EST); Yeah, I'll do this... Hey, it was one of the first questions on our local autox board that came up when someone saw that the '05 rules were going to be online. FWIW, I have no problem whatsoever wit; /html/autox/2004-11/msg00163.html (9,691 bytes)
54. RE: [evolution-disc.] annual tech and online rules? (score: 1): Author: Mark Andy <mark@sccaprepared.com>; Date: Tue, 23 Nov 2004 13:54:44 -0500 (EST); Indeed. Am I the only one that thinks divisionals are silly? They're solely run by the local region, which is a _huge_ burden compared to a tour where the national staff helps or a regional where yo; /html/autox/2004-11/msg00171.html (10,515 bytes)
55. JACircuits timer failure... (score: 1): Author: Mark Andy <mark@sccaprepared.com>; Date: Tue, 19 Oct 2004 13:20:51 -0400 (EDT); I was wondering if anyone had any insight as to what might be wrong with our timer... At our last event, the timer first started seeing finish trips well after the car went through the lights. I.e.,; /html/autox/2004-10/msg00037.html (7,283 bytes)
56. Re: Next Year's B-stock (score: 1): Author: Mark Andy <mark@sccaprepared.com>; Date: Fri, 22 Oct 2004 11:59:27 -0400 (EDT); It got recommended to the BOD I believe... And I doubt the BOD will push back on this one... :-) Folks seem to have different opinions. If I had one of those cars already, I'd probably give it a sho; /html/autox/2004-10/msg00054.html (7,237 bytes)
57. Re: dirtstockers (score: 1): Author: Mark Andy <mark@sccaprepared.com>; Date: Sun, 24 Oct 2004 09:55:37 -0400 (EDT); They're DOT approved (seems as though the dirt track folks have similar problems as us... :-). Shaved dirtstockers would be legal, though probably not the smartest choice. Mark; /html/autox/2004-10/msg00058.html (6,930 bytes)
58. BMW E36 Dalan receiver & brake light adapter for sale (score: 1): Author: Mark Andy <mark@sccaprepared.com>; Date: Sun, 24 Oct 2004 12:00:49 -0400 (EDT); I've got a Dalan hitch receiver and Hoppy brake light adapter for an e36 bmw that I don't need... It was mounted on my '93 325is and I assume it works on any 'non-hatchback' e36. $100 plus shipping; /html/autox/2004-10/msg00059.html (6,676 bytes)
59. where to buy a donut tire? (score: 1): Author: Mark Andy <mark@sccaprepared.com>; Date: Tue, 26 Oct 2004 10:18:50 -0400 (EDT); Anyone know where you can buy a donut replacement tire? I'm not finding much of anything on tirerack... Thanks! Mark; /html/autox/2004-10/msg00063.html (6,488 bytes)
60. Re: Magnetic Car numbers (score: 1): Author: Mark Andy <mark@sccaprepared.com>; Date: Wed, 27 Oct 2004 15:53:53 -0400 (EDT); By golly, that's just clever as heck. I've done numbers myself for a number of years, always holding the paper template carefully so that it won't shift when I'm outlining it in pen. Thanks! Mark; /html/autox/2004-10/msg00079.html (7,040 bytes)

Current List: 41 - 60
Page: [1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6]