Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +from:jeff.mohler@wilcom.com: 111 ]

Total 111 documents matching your query.

81. RE: SP rules and ESP Clarification (score: 1)
Author: "Mohler, Jeff" <jeff.mohler@wilcom.com>
Date: Mon, 22 Mar 1999 16:05:59 -0600
315FtLbs at crank at stock everything..not bad, but way up there at 4,000rpm. HP Peak stock is about 5600rpm. Not exactly a corner kicker at low RPMs
/html/autox/1999-03/msg01341.html (8,593 bytes)

82. RE: SP rules and ESP Clarification (score: 1)
Author: "Mohler, Jeff" <jeff.mohler@wilcom.com>
Date: Mon, 22 Mar 1999 15:34:27 -0700
http://198.252.200.66/readersrides/benjamin_treynor/Supra_dyno_run.jpg Thats a fairly good representation of a stock MK4 (Run #1) and a modified MK4 (Run #5). The modified run seems totally de-tuned
/html/autox/1999-03/msg01345.html (10,071 bytes)

83. RE: SP rules and ESP Clarification (score: 1)
Author: "Mohler, Jeff" <jeff.mohler@wilcom.com>
Date: Mon, 22 Mar 1999 16:49:35 -0600
-- Even if I was very very loose with the rules, theres no way you could pull 400rwhp on a MK4 without breaking lots of rules.
/html/autox/1999-03/msg01348.html (9,117 bytes)

84. RE: SP rules and ESP Clarification (score: 1)
Author: "Mohler, Jeff" <jeff.mohler@wilcom.com>
Date: Tue, 23 Mar 1999 08:24:50 -0700
-- If 4,000rpm is "a bit later" sure, but since you're probly turning by that point....
/html/autox/1999-03/msg01409.html (8,945 bytes)

85. RE: SP rules and ESP Clarification (score: 1)
Author: "Mohler, Jeff" <jeff.mohler@wilcom.com>
Date: Tue, 23 Mar 1999 11:16:48 -0700
-- I think it will be just the opposite. The SCCA will be building itself to be the exclusive home for NON tuborcharged cars. A HUGE section of the sports-car society will be ostracized from even co
/html/autox/1999-03/msg01424.html (9,827 bytes)

86. RE: SP rules and ESP Clarification (score: 1)
Author: "Mohler, Jeff" <jeff.mohler@wilcom.com>
Date: Tue, 23 Mar 1999 13:43:25 -0700
-- That SHOULD have been taken into account when boost-assisted cars were first classed. But since they screwed that up, they wanna shove a stick up our pipes. Yeah, thats fair. This might sound red
/html/autox/1999-03/msg01443.html (9,202 bytes)

87. RE: Slotted rotors in ST? (score: 1)
Author: "Mohler, Jeff" <jeff.mohler@wilcom.com>
Date: Tue, 23 Mar 1999 13:45:03 -0700
I would class slotted under the same theory as cross-drilled.
/html/autox/1999-03/msg01444.html (7,329 bytes)

88. RE: SP rules and ESP Clarification (score: 1)
Author: "Mohler, Jeff" <jeff.mohler@wilcom.com>
Date: Tue, 23 Mar 1999 15:28:49 -0600
-- The MK3 Supra (87-92) will show a 1-1.5psi increase in manifold delivered boost even though we have a mechanically driven wastegate...simply because the thermal efficiency of the turbo is greater
/html/autox/1999-03/msg01451.html (9,424 bytes)

89. RE: Clorox for your tires? (score: 1)
Author: "Mohler, Jeff" <jeff.mohler@wilcom.com>
Date: Wed, 24 Mar 1999 18:20:32 -0600
The use of traction compounds is legal? I can swipe down the R's with VHT before a run if i wanted to?
/html/autox/1999-03/msg01520.html (9,050 bytes)

90. RE: Clorox for your tires? (score: 1)
Author: "Mohler, Jeff" <jeff.mohler@wilcom.com>
Date: Wed, 24 Mar 1999 19:39:40 -0700
-- Of course. Being a dragracer, I understand that. In defense of VHT, the entire dragstrip is coated hevailly with this stuff as well, and most people dont bother with direct application. But I -am
/html/autox/1999-03/msg01529.html (9,079 bytes)

91. Spacers: pros and cons.. (score: 1)
Author: "Mohler, Jeff" <jeff.mohler@wilcom.com>
Date: Thu, 25 Mar 1999 15:39:06 -0600
What are the relative pros and cons of using spacers (if you dont require them) in autox? Thanks.
/html/autox/1999-03/msg01566.html (6,383 bytes)

92. Comparison: MR2T -vs- M3/Z3 (score: 1)
Author: "Mohler, Jeff" <jeff.mohler@wilcom.com>
Date: Mon, 29 Mar 1999 09:15:27 -0600
Our local region (NeOkla) only has the MR2Turbo in AS, and another region I'll be racing in next month (WOR) seems to only have the M3 in AS. I took our VR4 out yesterday, and slaughtered AS, and los
/html/autox/1999-03/msg01717.html (7,089 bytes)

93. RE: Comparison: MR2T -vs- M3/Z3 (score: 1)
Author: "Mohler, Jeff" <jeff.mohler@wilcom.com>
Date: Mon, 29 Mar 1999 09:48:59 -0600
No mention of the Stealth/VR4 I see *hmm*
/html/autox/1999-03/msg01726.html (8,795 bytes)

94. RE: Comparison: MR2T -vs- M3/Z3 (score: 1)
Author: "Mohler, Jeff" <jeff.mohler@wilcom.com>
Date: Mon, 29 Mar 1999 13:11:05 -0600
-- With any luck, I'll try to change that view. *grin* -- Maybe the MK4 is, but the MK3 is 100Hp slower than the new-style. Mis-classed??
/html/autox/1999-03/msg01744.html (7,152 bytes)

95. RE: FS: 1984 RX-7 (score: 1)
Author: "Mohler, Jeff" <jeff.mohler@wilcom.com>
Date: Wed, 17 Feb 1999 20:38:08 -0600
*shameless plug* Does drivetrain loss just ruin your mornings? Try old & not-so-recently improved Redline Oils! 87T Supra 342Hp @wheels on an -actual- Dyno on dino-oil. 354Hp @wheels with some real f
/html/autox/1999-02/msg00944.html (8,476 bytes)

96. RE: Brake fluid and Mityvac (score: 1)
Author: "Mohler, Jeff" <jeff.mohler@wilcom.com>
Date: Thu, 18 Feb 1999 18:43:03 -0600
What Ive got in my notes is tha MOTUL 5.1 Synth is dry 585°F, wet 421°F boiling points, and on top of that they advertise an 'exceptional recovery time'. I pay about $10 per pint here in Tulsa, but y
/html/autox/1999-02/msg01016.html (9,189 bytes)

97. Newbie #2.. (score: 1)
Author: "Mohler, Jeff" <jeff.mohler@wilcom.com>
Date: Thu, 18 Feb 1999 19:07:19 -0600
I joined this list because I heard there was some debate over turbocharged cars..and various topics. Plus..I AutoX too. *grin* Might I ask what the results or open issues are concerning the debate s
/html/autox/1999-02/msg01024.html (6,396 bytes)

98. RE: G-Force Tires Report and For Sale (score: 1)
Author: "Mohler, Jeff" <jeff.mohler@wilcom.com>
Date: Thu, 18 Feb 1999 19:39:37 -0600
Rob: Jeff in Tulsa. Nice post on the tires! I might add that the Hoosier S2s I had last year were an excellent tire, our only problem was that we had a tad too wide of a tire for our wheel, but the m
/html/autox/1999-02/msg01029.html (9,927 bytes)

99. RE: Surge tanks and motor mounts, why not? (score: 1)
Author: "Mohler, Jeff" <jeff.mohler@wilcom.com>
Date: Fri, 19 Feb 1999 15:50:53 -0600
-- Doug: I feel your pain. The turbocharged vehicles out there are grossly discrimintaed against in the rules, bu nothing more than sheer ignorance by the SCCA. Upgrading the compressor release valv
/html/autox/1999-02/msg01089.html (9,481 bytes)

100. RE: Surge tanks and motor mounts, why not? (score: 1)
Author: "Mohler, Jeff" <jeff.mohler@wilcom.com>
Date: Sat, 20 Feb 1999 15:22:03 -0600
-- You assume that additions to the car (which would be illegal) are present that would spin the turbo up while not under load, without that sort of system, the BOV is a zero HP gain. Without a BOV,
/html/autox/1999-02/msg01131.html (11,777 bytes)

Current List: 81 - 100
Page: [1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6]
This search system is powered by Namazu