Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +from:awhollis@swbell.net: 139 ]

Total 139 documents matching your query.

61. RE: [evolution-disc.] Re: Complete ProSolo points.... (score: 1)
Author: "Andy Hollis" <awhollis@swbell.net>
Date: Wed, 14 May 2003 12:20:17 -0500
It makes perfect sense if you consider that the logistics of memberships and licenses is handled by SCCA's central licensing department. That includes all of the various road racing specialties, as
/html/autox/2003-05/msg00112.html (8,898 bytes)

62. RE: [evolution-disc.] Re: Mazda Rev It Up - Atlanta (score: 1)
Author: "Andy Hollis" <awhollis@swbell.net>
Date: Tue, 20 May 2003 07:07:46 -0500
My $.02: Just shift it once and leave it alone. The course will likely be pretty busy near the start so you'll be shifting where convenient, not necessarily timing it for maximum revs. Better to shif
/html/autox/2003-05/msg00175.html (11,947 bytes)

63. RE: [evolution-disc.] Re: Mazda Rev It Up - Atlanta (score: 1)
Author: "Andy Hollis" <awhollis@swbell.net>
Date: Tue, 20 May 2003 07:29:19 -0500
The answer to that is implied in my original post. :-) --Andy /// unsubscribe/change address requests to majordomo@autox.team.net or try /// http://www.team.net/mailman/listinfo /// Partial archives
/html/autox/2003-05/msg00177.html (9,177 bytes)

64. RE: [evolution-disc.] ProSolo Bonus Point? (score: 1)
Author: "Andy Hollis" <awhollis@swbell.net>
Date: Tue, 27 May 2003 10:56:31 -0500
Not in the Supps. Its right there in your handy-dandy rulebook, lazy bones. Page 157 --Andy /// unsubscribe/change address requests to majordomo@autox.team.net or try /// http://www.team.net/mailman/
/html/autox/2003-05/msg00221.html (9,191 bytes)

65. RE: [evolution-disc.] ProSolo Bonus Point? (score: 1)
Author: "Andy Hollis" <awhollis@swbell.net>
Date: Tue, 27 May 2003 11:34:29 -0500
And if you agree with Erik, write a letter (e-mail). Only, don't send it to the SEB this time, send it to the Pro Solo folks. hduncan@scca.com and tgoodale@scca.com And while you are at it, weigh in
/html/autox/2003-05/msg00223.html (9,182 bytes)

66. RE: [evolution-disc.] ProSolo Bonus Point? (score: 1)
Author: "Andy Hollis" <awhollis@swbell.net>
Date: Tue, 27 May 2003 14:06:11 -0500
Gotcha to look, though, didn't I? :-) BTW, the CD makes a nice second copy for home/work use. --Andy /// unsubscribe/change address requests to majordomo@autox.team.net or try /// http://www.team.net
/html/autox/2003-05/msg00224.html (8,218 bytes)

67. RE: [evolution-disc.] ProSolo Bonus Point? (score: 1)
Author: "Andy Hollis" <awhollis@swbell.net>
Date: Tue, 27 May 2003 15:23:13 -0500
The other difference then was that we had two fewer events. Adding two events to the schedule increases the number of new participants that will have at least the minimum number of events required t
/html/autox/2003-05/msg00229.html (9,604 bytes)

68. RE: [evolution-disc.] ProSolo Bonus Points (score: 1)
Author: "Andy Hollis" <awhollis@swbell.net>
Date: Thu, 10 Apr 2003 08:24:54 -0500
If you are talking about the new proposal, the deal is: Next year. This was initially announced, then rescinded. But there is a single extra point awarded if you win your class by enough that no one
/html/autox/2003-04/msg00120.html (9,352 bytes)

69. RE: [evolution-disc.] ProSolo Bonus Points (score: 1)
Author: "Andy Hollis" <awhollis@swbell.net>
Date: Thu, 10 Apr 2003 11:37:00 -0500
Personally, I agree that more events should count. Putting on my "Old Fart" hat, "back in the day" three events counted, not two. That pretty much forced a potential class champ to travel a long way
/html/autox/2003-04/msg00129.html (9,362 bytes)

70. RE: [evolution-disc.] ProSolo Bonus Points (score: 1)
Author: "Andy Hollis" <awhollis@swbell.net>
Date: Thu, 10 Apr 2003 11:53:33 -0500
Since we are on the topic of Pro points, I thought I'd bring up another one that's be nagging in my craw for awhile. Overall Championship. Back in the day, the Overall Championship included those poi
/html/autox/2003-04/msg00131.html (11,983 bytes)

71. RE: [evolution-disc.] ProSolo Bonus Points (score: 1)
Author: "Andy Hollis" <awhollis@swbell.net>
Date: Thu, 10 Apr 2003 12:18:07 -0500
Seems like making the bonus point a Challenge point is the best answer. Just another variation on top qualifier bonus points. --Andy --Original Message-- From: Stand0nIt@aol.com [mailto:Stand0nIt@aol
/html/autox/2003-04/msg00136.html (9,728 bytes)

72. RE: [evolution-disc.] ProSolo Bonus Points (score: 1)
Author: "Andy Hollis" <awhollis@swbell.net>
Date: Thu, 10 Apr 2003 12:32:07 -0500
No one disagrees that we should be trying to put the 32 "Fastest" drivers in the Challenge. The question is how best to determine that. An Index is flawed because it cannot possibly take into conside
/html/autox/2003-04/msg00138.html (9,853 bytes)

73. Re: Subaru Roll-Over in Mineral Wells?? (score: 1)
Author: "Andy Hollis" <awhollis@swbell.net>
Date: Sun, 13 Apr 2003 23:30:54 -0500
Try here for a bit more info, Phil: http://www.miataforum.com/ubb/ultimatebb.php?ubb=get_topic;f=4;t=002547#0000 06 --Andy /// unsubscribe/change address requests to majordomo@autox.team.net or try
/html/autox/2003-04/msg00163.html (7,695 bytes)

74. RE: Subaru Roll-Over in Mineral Wells?? (score: 1)
Author: "Andy Hollis" <awhollis@swbell.net>
Date: Mon, 14 Apr 2003 08:28:19 -0500
It was PCA and they regularly run weekends with a hi-speed (Solo 1-ish) event on Saturday and a regular autocross on Sunday. I believe this was during the Saturday hi speed event. They have more stri
/html/autox/2003-04/msg00166.html (8,433 bytes)

75. RE: [evolution-disc.] T-Rex's legal for Solo2? (score: 1)
Author: "Andy Hollis" <awhollis@swbell.net>
Date: Mon, 14 Apr 2003 12:02:02 -0500
Rule 12.1 (p 77) Definition of car, requires four wheels. The safety rules and car classification rules reference the word "car". --Andy /// unsubscribe/change address requests to majordomo@autox.tea
/html/autox/2003-04/msg00174.html (9,097 bytes)

76. Extra Techie: shock shaft velocities in Solo? (score: 1)
Author: "Andy Hollis" <awhollis@swbell.net>
Date: Wed, 16 Apr 2003 15:35:02 -0500
Guy Ankeny has done so, I believe and I know that Tommy Saunders has. But the actual shaft velocities depend on the motion ratio of the particular vehicle. That can change the number easily by a fac
/html/autox/2003-04/msg00205.html (8,353 bytes)

77. Numbers (score: 1)
Author: "Andy Hollis" <awhollis@swbell.net>
Date: Mon, 28 Apr 2003 20:13:53 -0500
Sounds like some good point/counterpoint going on here. Keep it up. Its important that we deal with this once and move on. Since the proposal went out without some of the rationale, I'll jump in and
/html/autox/2003-04/msg00305.html (10,669 bytes)

78. RE: Numbers (score: 1)
Author: "Andy Hollis" <awhollis@swbell.net>
Date: Mon, 28 Apr 2003 21:20:26 -0500
That's what we have now. The rule expresses lots of intent with very little detail. As a result people interpret it in widely varying ways. So, we are proposing making it very clear. As soon as you
/html/autox/2003-04/msg00307.html (10,399 bytes)

79. RE: Numbers (score: 1)
Author: "Andy Hollis" <awhollis@swbell.net>
Date: Tue, 29 Apr 2003 07:11:42 -0500
BTDT. Not everyone will agree with you. Then what do you do? --Andy "who has done that walk several times already this year" /// unsubscribe/change address requests to majordomo@autox.team.net or tr
/html/autox/2003-04/msg00315.html (8,517 bytes)

80. RE: Numbers (score: 1)
Author: "Andy Hollis" <awhollis@swbell.net>
Date: Tue, 29 Apr 2003 15:20:30 -0500
People can do this already. I could easily make a number protest stick on certain cars even with the current wording. There's lots of weenie-ish items that don't really affect performance that can b
/html/autox/2003-04/msg00334.html (8,871 bytes)

Current List: 61 - 80
Page: [1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7]
This search system is powered by Namazu