Mail Archive Search: <+from:Andrew_Bettencourt@kingston.com>

Results:

References: [ +from:Andrew_Bettencourt@kingston.com: 249 ]

Total 249 documents matching your query.

41. Re: M3 Out of ESP - No Longer a Controversy (score: 1): Author: Andrew_Bettencourt@kingston.com; Date: Thu, 14 Sep 2000 20:27:55 -0700; Well it is relevant! That was my whole point to how good a driver Bob is! Who was driving the DOHC cars in 1995 when Bob won? Still an acheivment... AB Markdaddio@aol.com on 09/14/2000 08:14:14 PM To; /html/autox/2000-09/msg00426.html (8,971 bytes)
42. Re: The Ultimate I-Class (score: 1): Author: Andrew_Bettencourt@kingston.com; Date: Fri, 22 Sep 2000 07:07:12 -0700; Hey Dennis - before you start typing/replying ...don't even waste your time. There are more "pfoster" filters out there than there were CP drivers at Nationals... AB Paul Foster <pfoster@gdi.net> on; /html/autox/2000-09/msg00958.html (8,121 bytes)
43. Re: The Ultimate I-Class (score: 1): Author: Andrew_Bettencourt@kingston.com; Date: Fri, 22 Sep 2000 07:17:44 -0700; Nope! I love a few laughs during the day! AB Paul Foster <pfoster@gdi.net> on 09/22/2000 10:15:13 AM To: Andrew Bettencourt/FIELD SALES/Kingston@Kingston cc: "team.net" <autox@autox.team.net> Looks l; /html/autox/2000-09/msg00962.html (8,091 bytes)
44. 1995 RX-7 R2 for sale (score: 1): Author: Andrew_Bettencourt@kingston.com; Date: Mon, 25 Sep 2000 10:14:44 -0700; --0__=hvEEfKZZIRCtiSLFvSOTw7zHHf7aYlKRFwcYwPOHRRemsNMzY1QIa9nD Content-Disposition: inline 1995 Mazda RX-7 R2 1 of 182 Vintage Red 5 speed 60K miles NO PROBLEMS ever Synthetics throughout K&N drop in; /html/autox/2000-09/msg01138.html (7,228 bytes)
45. Re: Vote for your own class (Was: Ladies classes) (score: 1): Author: Andrew_Bettencourt@kingston.com; Date: Wed, 27 Sep 2000 06:34:59 -0700; This is interesting to me Eric - how would you have any clue what letters came in? AB "Eric Linnhoff" <eric10mm@qni.com> on 09/27/2000 01:43:45 AM Please respond to "Eric Linnhoff" <eric10mm@qni.com; /html/autox/2000-09/msg01337.html (8,628 bytes)
46. Re: Reclassification.......What will happen in STS? (score: 1): Author: Andrew_Bettencourt@kingston.com; Date: Thu, 3 Aug 2000 12:45:26 -0700; The stock classes and ST (S or R) have nothing to do with each other. ST has everything from 3 series BMW's to zero HP econoboxes. The classes have NO correlation at all. Keep in mind that all limite; /html/autox/2000-08/msg00109.html (8,647 bytes)
47. Re: Sunfire (score: 1): Author: Andrew_Bettencourt@kingston.com; Date: Tue, 8 Aug 2000 06:01:08 -0700; Bruce is right on. John is very talented with a second year under his 'return' year. He has many years of experience. Furthuring the proof that a talented driver beats a mediocre one even when the eq; /html/autox/2000-08/msg00249.html (6,989 bytes)
48. Re: Z06 Corvette and Nationals? (score: 1): Author: Andrew_Bettencourt@kingston.com; Date: Wed, 9 Aug 2000 19:53:59 -0700; It is my understanding that the Z06 is a MODEL, not an option. Just like the ZR-1 was. AB Lee Piccione <leepic@smart.net> on 08/09/2000 06:39:17 PM Please respond to Lee Piccione <leepic@smart.net> T; /html/autox/2000-08/msg00353.html (10,288 bytes)
49. RE: Z06 - Can I Play? (score: 1): Author: Andrew_Bettencourt@kingston.com; Date: Thu, 10 Aug 2000 06:44:43 -0700; I agree with both of you. BSP is always open if you want to compete and soak up the atmosphere. These cars are trickling into delaerships. To allow this car to compete would be a diservice to SS. Why; /html/autox/2000-08/msg00371.html (9,213 bytes)
50. Re: new classifications (score: 1): Author: Andrew_Bettencourt@kingston.com; Date: Tue, 15 Aug 2000 07:54:55 -0700; Yup, you sure did. The new stock class reorg is targeted for 2001 implementation. The cars you specifically mentioned are moves that were proposed by members or the SCAC, recommended by the SCAC, put; /html/autox/2000-08/msg00625.html (8,080 bytes)
51. Re: new classifications (score: 1): Author: Andrew_Bettencourt@kingston.com; Date: Tue, 15 Aug 2000 08:34:53 -0700; Excellent point...Maybe GH can shed some light on this. My impression is that the M3 and maybe a couple others got lumped together in this paragraph but were specifically mentioned elsewhere. Except.; /html/autox/2000-08/msg00631.html (9,082 bytes)
52. Re: Uh-oh, Scarlett's in trouble. (score: 1): Author: Andrew_Bettencourt@kingston.com; Date: Thu, 17 Aug 2000 05:45:09 -0700; As long as you don't run your solo stickers all season, why would your dealer even know you autox? Seems as if the CV boot cracked and it is getting replaced...simple as that. I would find another de; /html/autox/2000-08/msg00722.html (8,379 bytes)
53. Re: STS SportsCar Predictions (score: 1): Author: Andrew_Bettencourt@kingston.com; Date: Thu, 17 Aug 2000 06:03:25 -0700; Nationals shouldn't have a start even remotely like a Pro - and it hasn't in the few years I have been going. I think the Subaru is an interesting pick for a couple of reasons: The addition of spring; /html/autox/2000-08/msg00727.html (9,398 bytes)
54. Shock access - am I stupid? (score: 1): Author: Andrew_Bettencourt@kingston.com; Date: Fri, 18 Aug 2000 12:20:44 -0700; What is the majority opinion: is the drilling as a fundimental act the problem or the "weight removal" of holes and the like. Here is my perspective: If I could drill some sort of beveled hole in whi; /html/autox/2000-08/msg00903.html (11,589 bytes)
55. Re: I'm coming to Kansas! (score: 1): Author: Andrew_Bettencourt@kingston.com; Date: Thu, 31 Aug 2000 10:44:11 -0700; Andy Bettencourt Vince Bly <vbly@pop200.gsfc.nasa.gov> on 08/31/2000 11:22:16 PM Please respond to Vince Bly <vbly@pop200.gsfc.nasa.gov> To: "Team.Net" <autox@autox.team.net> cc: (bcc: Andrew Bettenc; /html/autox/2000-08/msg01375.html (8,316 bytes)
56. Was Peru: Now restructure comments (score: 1): Author: Andrew_Bettencourt@kingston.com; Date: Wed, 5 Jul 2000 08:10:20 -0700; There should Just because a car is slow, doesn't mean that it is the least expensive. That new HS/ES class might end up having to have a brand new car to be competitive - say $12K-$15K right there.; /html/autox/2000-07/msg00092.html (7,093 bytes)
57. RE: Stock class reclassings (score: 1): Author: Andrew_Bettencourt@kingston.com; Date: Thu, 6 Jul 2000 06:31:42 -0700; Nope - sold. And IMHO, that '1st gen' R/T wouldn't be the car to have. GTS all the way. AB Let us not forget Last time I checked Mr. Jim Harnish still has his national champion winning stock class Vi; /html/autox/2000-07/msg00145.html (9,528 bytes)
58. Re: Stock reclassification???? the answer (VERY LONG) (score: 1): Author: Andrew_Bettencourt@kingston.com; Date: Thu, 6 Jul 2000 07:43:24 -0700; WOW! That was long...phew! Keep those letters coming on the S2000. The membership seems to be split right down the middle right now, so the SEB has to be taking a final look. Picked my side of the fe; /html/autox/2000-07/msg00152.html (15,108 bytes)
59. RE: Stock class reclassings (score: 1): Author: Andrew_Bettencourt@kingston.com; Date: Thu, 6 Jul 2000 08:57:20 -0700; E30 M3 specs Weight: 2735 0-60: 7.6 1/4: 15.7 AB Kevin McCormick <ktm@unify.com> on 07/06/2000 11:07:31 AM Please respond to Kevin McCormick <ktm@unify.com> To: "team.net" <autox@autox.team.net> cc:; /html/autox/2000-07/msg00159.html (11,429 bytes)
60. Re: SS/WS6 stock classification (score: 1): Author: Andrew_Bettencourt@kingston.com; Date: Thu, 6 Jul 2000 13:30:42 -0700; You make all valid points. These points are ones that the SCAC and SEB have considered for years. The early cars are the ones that will have documentation issues but the problem becomes separating c; /html/autox/2000-07/msg00187.html (10,999 bytes)

Current List: 41 - 60
Page: [1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7] [8] [9] [10] [11] [12] [13]