>William Loring Wrote:
>I would humbly disagree with those that say that ES and HS should be combined.
There should
>be room at the bottom for those of us that don't have the money/desire to
>have the newest/fastest equipment. I have no problem with the changes at the
>top, I'm not qualified to judge them. But the view from down here is not so
>good.
Just because a car is slow, doesn't mean that it is the least expensive. That
new HS/ES class might end up having to have a brand new car to be competitive -
say $12K-$15K right there. You can get a 1993 RX-7 TT or a C4 Vette for that
money!
Take a look at Class 6 (the old C stock) and the new Class 8. Fun cars that are
quick and inexpensive. Those two classes should be very well subscibed IMHO...
AB
|