triumphs
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [TR] Hi-torq starter

To: Randall <TR3driver@ca.rr.com>
Subject: Re: [TR] Hi-torq starter
From: Tom Fansher <tfansher@comcast.net>
Date: Sat, 20 Apr 2019 18:18:03 -0400
Cc: Triumphs@autox.team.net
Delivered-to: mharc@autox.team.net
Delivered-to: triumphs@autox.team.net
References: <00c501d4f770$fd849770$f88dc650$@uprichard.net> <A1356327-D314-49F7-B0BC-799813A6A5BB@comcast.net> <4F95E0A00E93401595B92537D175710D@RYPC>
Glad I started something and learned something,too. Once again, thanks to the 
list
Tom

Sent from my iPhone

> On Apr 20, 2019, at 3:49 PM, Randall <TR3driver@ca.rr.com> wrote:
> 
> Kinda does matter; the early press-on ring gear is larger diameter than the
> later bolt-on.  And since the starter mounts in the same place, the pinion
> gear needs to change to keep the right clearance with the larger or smaller
> ring gear.
> 
> The change came when they switched original starter styles; the early
> starter had a smaller shaft that was supported at both ends.  The later
> starter only supports the shaft at one end and in the middle, the drive
> hangs out in space.  So it needed a much beefier shaft, and the gear got
> larger to fit on the larger shaft.  Etc, etc.
> 
> -- Randall 
> 56 TR3 TS13571L once and future daily driver
> 71 Stag LE1473 - awaiting engine rebuild
> 71-2-3 Stag - awaiting gearbox rebuild 
> 
>> It's my understanding that it doesn't matter. 
> 

** triumphs@autox.team.net **

Archive: http://www.team.net/pipermail/triumphs  http://www.team.net/archive


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>