triumphs
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [TR] Hi-torq starter

To: "'Tom Fansher'" <tfansher@comcast.net>, "'Andrew Uprichard'" <auprichard@uprichard.net>
Subject: Re: [TR] Hi-torq starter
From: "Randall" <TR3driver@ca.rr.com>
Date: Sat, 20 Apr 2019 12:49:17 -0700
Cc: Triumphs@autox.team.net
Delivered-to: mharc@autox.team.net
Delivered-to: triumphs@autox.team.net
References: <00c501d4f770$fd849770$f88dc650$@uprichard.net> <A1356327-D314-49F7-B0BC-799813A6A5BB@comcast.net>
Thread-index: AdT3ikjUvmtiBECdQrOQao7Z4ckK1wAJ1cTg 48sFtmRa11AXtQB1s2Jz7d8IJ847UjmF3vgZ5shPIIMwwrfqJnNiLIIAyQhAPSz2/Z0tZAKEPt/QgNwaDsiENL0gVMEwOyeQmno4x4fTNGRRIBQGNryTotUQ GkJRV2muCIkCnZVXvaE1pQ==
Kinda does matter; the early press-on ring gear is larger diameter than the
later bolt-on.  And since the starter mounts in the same place, the pinion
gear needs to change to keep the right clearance with the larger or smaller
ring gear.

The change came when they switched original starter styles; the early
starter had a smaller shaft that was supported at both ends.  The later
starter only supports the shaft at one end and in the middle, the drive
hangs out in space.  So it needed a much beefier shaft, and the gear got
larger to fit on the larger shaft.  Etc, etc.

-- Randall 
56 TR3 TS13571L once and future daily driver
71 Stag LE1473 - awaiting engine rebuild
71-2-3 Stag - awaiting gearbox rebuild 

> It's my understanding that it doesn't matter. 

** triumphs@autox.team.net **

Archive: http://www.team.net/pipermail/triumphs  http://www.team.net/archive


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>