To: | "'Tom Fansher'" <tfansher@comcast.net>, "'Andrew Uprichard'" <auprichard@uprichard.net> |
---|---|
Subject: | Re: [TR] Hi-torq starter |
From: | "Randall" <TR3driver@ca.rr.com> |
Date: | Sat, 20 Apr 2019 12:49:17 -0700 |
Cc: | Triumphs@autox.team.net |
Delivered-to: | mharc@autox.team.net |
Delivered-to: | triumphs@autox.team.net |
References: | <00c501d4f770$fd849770$f88dc650$@uprichard.net> <A1356327-D314-49F7-B0BC-799813A6A5BB@comcast.net> |
Thread-index: | AdT3ikjUvmtiBECdQrOQao7Z4ckK1wAJ1cTg 48sFtmRa11AXtQB1s2Jz7d8IJ847UjmF3vgZ5shPIIMwwrfqJnNiLIIAyQhAPSz2/Z0tZAKEPt/QgNwaDsiENL0gVMEwOyeQmno4x4fTNGRRIBQGNryTotUQ GkJRV2muCIkCnZVXvaE1pQ== |
Kinda does matter; the early press-on ring gear is larger diameter than the later bolt-on. And since the starter mounts in the same place, the pinion gear needs to change to keep the right clearance with the larger or smaller ring gear. The change came when they switched original starter styles; the early starter had a smaller shaft that was supported at both ends. The later starter only supports the shaft at one end and in the middle, the drive hangs out in space. So it needed a much beefier shaft, and the gear got larger to fit on the larger shaft. Etc, etc. -- Randall 56 TR3 TS13571L once and future daily driver 71 Stag LE1473 - awaiting engine rebuild 71-2-3 Stag - awaiting gearbox rebuild > It's my understanding that it doesn't matter. ** triumphs@autox.team.net ** Archive: http://www.team.net/pipermail/triumphs http://www.team.net/archive |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | Re: [TR] Hi-torq starter, Randall |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Re: [TR] One owner 69 TR6 @ 60k miles, Andrew Uprichard |
Previous by Thread: | Re: [TR] Hi-torq starter, Randall |
Next by Thread: | Re: [TR] Hi-torq starter, Tom Fansher |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |