triumphs
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [TR] Ruminations

To: John Innis <jdinnis@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [TR] Ruminations
From: Joe Burlein <floridatr6@cfl.rr.com>
Date: Tue, 15 Dec 2015 15:39:01 -0500
Cc: Triumphs List <triumphs@autox.team.net>
Delivered-to: mharc@autox.team.net
Delivered-to: triumphs@autox.team.net
References: <CAJ1eQwi0gsMix48HY+S52h0phX6mOLkeD+onrnJfb_j3ArX7-g@mail.gmail.com> <D4.60.10023.2EE40765@cdptpa-oedge03> <CAO8Q7CNQdy_5kXoHY2apUv5DYj8w5uiN=yOO4V3Fv3+kbRDnfA@mail.gmail.com> <567062EB.4080701@adelphia.net> <2A1D8664-7899-4BCF-BD71-A92209B3089D@cfl.rr.com> <CANuE7YDPvRKFEvc+ky31z0KdUakEopiF+m3TyFVdbS977FeXTg@mail.gmail.com>
--===============5638979555961659808==
        boundary=Apple-Mail-089184A7-0F5B-443C-A024-31976AD64EFE
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit


--Apple-Mail-089184A7-0F5B-443C-A024-31976AD64EFE
        charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

True, but I always wondered what kind of gas mileage you'd get if you went b=
ate bones!

Joe B
72 TR6

> On Dec 15, 2015, at 14:49, John Innis <jdinnis@gmail.com> wrote:
>=20
> It's not just the increased weight, but in some case, not EVEN increased w=
eight. =20
> First, compare a Camry to something comparable for it's day (say a '50s Fo=
rd Fairlane) and you will see the Camry comes in a few hundred pounds lighte=
r.  Not really fair to compare a modern family sedan (even a compact) to a s=
ports car of any vintage. =20
> The other big difference is the performance of the motor for the given mil=
eage.  The Camry I-4 (circa 2012) will do 0-60 in 8.4 secs making about 178h=
p from 2.5l.  The TR3 made a (reported) 10 second 0-60 on 100hp from the 2.2=
 motor in a package weighing 1000lbs less.  So you do get something for all t=
hat fancy new fangled tech.
>=20
>> On Tue, Dec 15, 2015 at 1:28 PM, Joe Burlein <floridatr6@cfl.rr.com> wrot=
e:
>> I think you hit it on the head with weight.  Air con, door braces, heated=
 seats, stereo systems, stability control, infotainment, sound deadening, et=
c. PLUS the literal hundreds of pounds of wiring to support all that stuff k=
ills economy.  And stupid ethanol in the US doesn't help a bit either!
>>=20
>> Joe B
>> 72 TR6
>>=20
>> > On Dec 15, 2015, at 13:58, Bob Labuz <yellowtr@adelphia.net> wrote:
>> >
>> > Jeff,
>> >
>> > Not so sure I agree.
>> >
>> > I have made over 30MPG on my 2.2 liter TR3 in the past.  87MM upgrade b=
ut with the stock 4sp transmission.
>> > WIth OD, I am sure many have done better.
>> >
>> > I average about 25MPG on all my Triumphs, a 3, 4 and 6 just driving to c=
ar hops etc. No real long range highway mileage. My wife's 4cyl Camry just a=
veraged about 35MPG on our trip out West. That is real good, but hardly twic=
e my 4CYLs Triumphs. And it is fuel infected etc with many computers running=
 the show and a 6 speed transmission. The only computer available when I dri=
ve a Triumph is in my pocket!
>> >
>> > The Camry is heavier I am sure and that engine will last for many more m=
iles but mileage has not improved as much as one would expect. I suspect som=
e of the problem is alcohol and less bang for the buck in the power in today=
s fuels.
>> >
>> > Bob
>> >
>> >> On 12/15/2015 01:44 PM, Jeff Scarbrough wrote:
>> >>> On Tue, Dec 15, 2015 at 12:33 PM, Randall <TR3driver@ca.rr.com> wrote=
:
>> >>> The glut has many causes, but I'd say chief among them is that the oi=
l companies have learned a LOT more since then on how to
>> >>> squeeze more oil out of the ground (steam injection, oil shale, frack=
ing, etc) plus how to squeeze more gasoline from a barrel of
>> >>> crude.
>> >> Not to mention overall average gasoline consumption per mile.  I'm not=

>> >> sure how that number has changed over the years...doubled? tripled?
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> Jeff Scarbrough
>> >> Corrosion Acres, Ga.
>> >>
>> >> ** triumphs@autox.team.net **
>> >>
>> >> Donate: http://www.team.net/donate.html
>> >> Archive: http://www.team.net/archive
>> >> Forums: http://www.team.net/forums
>> >> Unsubscribe/Manage: http://autox.team.net/mailman/options/triumphs/yel=
lowtr@adelphia.net
>> >
>> >
>> > ** triumphs@autox.team.net **
>> >
>> > Donate: http://www.team.net/donate.html
>> > Archive: http://www.team.net/archive
>> > Forums: http://www.team.net/forums
>> > Unsubscribe/Manage: http://autox.team.net/mailman/options/triumphs/flor=
idatr6@cfl.rr.com
>>=20
>> ** triumphs@autox.team.net **
>>=20
>> Donate: http://www.team.net/donate.html
>> Archive: http://www.team.net/archive
>> Forums: http://www.team.net/forums
>> Unsubscribe/Manage: http://autox.team.net/mailman/options/triumphs/jdinni=
s@gmail.com
>=20
>=20
>=20
> --=20
> =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=
=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D
> =3D Never offend people with style when you   =3D
> =3D can offend with substance --- Sam Brown  =3D
> =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=
=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D

--Apple-Mail-089184A7-0F5B-443C-A024-31976AD64EFE
        charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

<html><head><meta http-equiv=3D"content-type" content=3D"text/html; charset=3D=
utf-8"></head><body dir=3D"auto"><div>True, but I always wondered what kind o=
f gas mileage you'd get if you went bate bones!<br><br>Joe B<div>72 TR6</div=
></div><div><br>On Dec 15, 2015, at 14:49, John Innis &lt;<a href=3D"mailto:=
jdinnis@gmail.com">jdinnis@gmail.com</a>&gt; wrote:<br><br></div><blockquote=
 type=3D"cite"><div><div dir=3D"ltr">It's not just the increased weight, but=
 in some case, not EVEN increased weight.&nbsp; <br>First, compare a Camry t=
o something comparable for it's day (say a '50s Ford Fairlane) and you will s=
ee the Camry comes in a few hundred pounds lighter.&nbsp; Not really fair to=
 compare a modern family sedan (even a compact) to a sports car of any vinta=
ge.&nbsp; <br>The other big difference is the performance of the motor for t=
he given mileage.&nbsp; The Camry I-4 (circa 2012) will do 0-60 in 8.4 secs m=
aking about 178hp from 2.5l.&nbsp; The TR3 made a (reported) 10 second 0-60 o=
n 100hp from the 2.2 motor in a package weighing 1000lbs less.&nbsp; So you d=
o get something for all that fancy new fangled tech.<br></div><div class=3D"=
gmail_extra"><br><div class=3D"gmail_quote">On Tue, Dec 15, 2015 at 1:28 PM,=
 Joe Burlein <span dir=3D"ltr">&lt;<a href=3D"mailto:floridatr6@cfl.rr.com"; t=
arget=3D"_blank">floridatr6@cfl.rr.com</a>&gt;</span> wrote:<br><blockquote c=
lass=3D"gmail_quote" style=3D"margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;p=
adding-left:1ex">I think you hit it on the head with weight.&nbsp; Air con, d=
oor braces, heated seats, stereo systems, stability control, infotainment, s=
ound deadening, etc. PLUS the literal hundreds of pounds of wiring to suppor=
t all that stuff kills economy.&nbsp; And stupid ethanol in the US doesn't h=
elp a bit either!<br>
<br>
Joe B<br>
72 TR6<br>
<div><div class=3D"h5"><br>
&gt; On Dec 15, 2015, at 13:58, Bob Labuz &lt;<a href=3D"mailto:yellowtr@ade=
lphia.net">yellowtr@adelphia.net</a>&gt; wrote:<br>
&gt;<br>
&gt; Jeff,<br>
&gt;<br>
&gt; Not so sure I agree.<br>
&gt;<br>
&gt; I have made over 30MPG on my 2.2 liter TR3 in the past.&nbsp; 87MM upgr=
ade but with the stock 4sp transmission.<br>
&gt; WIth OD, I am sure many have done better.<br>
&gt;<br>
&gt; I average about 25MPG on all my Triumphs, a 3, 4 and 6 just driving to c=
ar hops etc. No real long range highway mileage. My wife's 4cyl Camry just a=
veraged about 35MPG on our trip out West. That is real good, but hardly twic=
e my 4CYLs Triumphs. And it is fuel infected etc with many computers running=
 the show and a 6 speed transmission. The only computer available when I dri=
ve a Triumph is in my pocket!<br>
&gt;<br>
&gt; The Camry is heavier I am sure and that engine will last for many more m=
iles but mileage has not improved as much as one would expect. I suspect som=
e of the problem is alcohol and less bang for the buck in the power in today=
s fuels.<br>
&gt;<br>
&gt; Bob<br>
&gt;<br>
&gt;&gt; On 12/15/2015 01:44 PM, Jeff Scarbrough wrote:<br>
&gt;&gt;&gt; On Tue, Dec 15, 2015 at 12:33 PM, Randall &lt;<a href=3D"mailto=
:TR3driver@ca.rr.com">TR3driver@ca.rr.com</a>&gt; wrote:<br>
&gt;&gt;&gt; The glut has many causes, but I'd say chief among them is that t=
he oil companies have learned a LOT more since then on how to<br>
&gt;&gt;&gt; squeeze more oil out of the ground (steam injection, oil shale,=
 fracking, etc) plus how to squeeze more gasoline from a barrel of<br>
&gt;&gt;&gt; crude.<br>
&gt;&gt; Not to mention overall average gasoline consumption per mile.&nbsp;=
 I'm not<br>
&gt;&gt; sure how that number has changed over the years...doubled? tripled?=
<br>
&gt;&gt;<br>
&gt;&gt;<br>
&gt;&gt; Jeff Scarbrough<br>
&gt;&gt; Corrosion Acres, Ga.<br>
&gt;&gt;<br>
&gt;&gt; ** <a href=3D"mailto:triumphs@autox.team.net";>triumphs@autox.team.n=
et</a> **<br>
&gt;&gt;<br>
&gt;&gt; Donate: <a href=3D"http://www.team.net/donate.html"; rel=3D"noreferr=
er" target=3D"_blank">http://www.team.net/donate.html</a><br>
&gt;&gt; Archive: <a href=3D"http://www.team.net/archive"; rel=3D"noreferrer"=
 target=3D"_blank">http://www.team.net/archive</a><br>
&gt;&gt; Forums: <a href=3D"http://www.team.net/forums"; rel=3D"noreferrer" t=
arget=3D"_blank">http://www.team.net/forums</a><br>
&gt;&gt; Unsubscribe/Manage: <a href=3D"http://autox.team.net/mailman/option=
s/triumphs/yellowtr@adelphia.net" rel=3D"noreferrer" target=3D"_blank">http:=
//autox.team.net/mailman/options/triumphs/yellowtr@adelphia.net</a><br>
&gt;<br>
&gt;<br>
&gt; ** <a href=3D"mailto:triumphs@autox.team.net";>triumphs@autox.team.net</=
a> **<br>
&gt;<br>
&gt; Donate: <a href=3D"http://www.team.net/donate.html"; rel=3D"noreferrer" t=
arget=3D"_blank">http://www.team.net/donate.html</a><br>
&gt; Archive: <a href=3D"http://www.team.net/archive"; rel=3D"noreferrer" tar=
get=3D"_blank">http://www.team.net/archive</a><br>
&gt; Forums: <a href=3D"http://www.team.net/forums"; rel=3D"noreferrer" targe=
t=3D"_blank">http://www.team.net/forums</a><br>
</div></div>&gt; Unsubscribe/Manage: <a href=3D"http://autox.team.net/mailma=
n/options/triumphs/floridatr6@cfl.rr.com" rel=3D"noreferrer" target=3D"_blan=
k">http://autox.team.net/mailman/options/triumphs/floridatr6@cfl.rr.com</a><=
br>
<div class=3D"HOEnZb"><div class=3D"h5"><br>
** <a href=3D"mailto:triumphs@autox.team.net";>triumphs@autox.team.net</a> **=
<br>
<br>
t=3D"_blank">http://www.team.net/donate.html</a><br>
Archive: <a href=3D"http://www.team.net/archive"; rel=3D"noreferrer" target=3D=
"_blank">http://www.team.net/archive</a><br>
Forums: <a href=3D"http://www.team.net/forums"; rel=3D"noreferrer" target=3D"=
_blank">http://www.team.net/forums</a><br>
s/jdinnis@gmail.com" rel=3D"noreferrer" target=3D"_blank">http://autox.team.=
net/mailman/options/triumphs/jdinnis@gmail.com</a><br>
</div></div></blockquote></div><br><br clear=3D"all"><br>-- <br><div class=3D=
"gmail_signature">=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=
=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D<br>=3D Never offend people with styl=
e when you&nbsp;&nbsp; =3D<br>=3D can offend with substance --- Sam Brown&nb=
sp; =3D<br>=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=
=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D</div>
</div>
</div></blockquote></body></html>=

--Apple-Mail-089184A7-0F5B-443C-A024-31976AD64EFE--

--===============5638979555961659808==
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline


** triumphs@autox.team.net **

Archive: http://www.team.net/archive

--===============5638979555961659808==--

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>