triumphs
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: Sad SU's

To: Steven Newell <steven@newellboys.com>
Subject: Re: Sad SU's
From: Dave Massey <105671.471@compuserve.com>
Date: Fri, 7 Feb 2003 11:55:29 -0500
Cc: Mark Hooper <mhooper@pixelsystems.com>, "'triumphs@autox.team.net '" <triumphs@autox.team.net>, "'Randall Young '" <ryoung@navcomtech.com> 42dbca82.dsl.aros.net id h17Gwchu012002
Message text written by Steven Newell
>Indeed, it seems SU's suffered a production setback during the first World
War yet grew dramatically during the second, so the peace factor in re
carburetors is mixed. But it's a darned fact that ZS's are clunky looking,
rather ugly carbs while SU's are a timeless museum-worthy design. And
you can get those shiny chrome carb covers for SU's too, what ZS
equipped show car stands a chance?
<

And it's a darned fact that your taste in carbs is in your mouth.  Reason
shows that the low profile domes and squared off features of the ZS are
much more appealing. 

Dave (Do I have a problem separating fact from opinion? Naw) Massey

P.S. Chrome dashpot covers are as tacky as racoon tails on aerials.

///  triumphs@autox.team.net mailing list
///  or try  http://www.team.net/cgi-bin/majorcool
///  Archives at http://www.team.net/archive


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>