triumphs
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: chrome

To: Randall Young <ryoung@navcomtech.com>
Subject: Re: chrome
From: Joe Curry <spitlist@gte.net>
Date: Sat, 21 Sep 2002 10:00:40 -0700
Cc: Triumphs <Triumphs@autox.team.net>
References: <NOEDJDCNFBCNELMBFNFEAEACDLAA.ryoung@navcomtech.com> out002.verizon.net from [68.129.88.77] at Sat, 21 Sep 2002 11:57:55 -0500
Randall Young wrote:

> While I agree about the difference in pricing, IMO triple plating is the
> only way to go.  Chrome simply will not stick directly to steel (triple
> plating consists of copper, nickel, then chrome), trying to take shortcuts
> here results in chrome that will start peeling off in just a few years.
> 
> Also, chrome will not stick to chrome, so if a piece has already been
> chromed, the only way to rechrome it is to strip off the old chrome.
> 
> If you're not going to do it right, then just buff up what you have and keep
> it waxed or clearcoated.


I'll add that I agree triple plating is the only way to go for street use.  The 
cheap plating that you normally get on a lot of replacement bumpers
and the like will not hold up to continuous exposure to moisture.  Therefore it 
won't be too long before you start seeing little brown patches
forming.  Trailer queens that are not exposed to that sort of environment might 
just do fine with single plated parts. (But I would not want to be the
test case for that)!

Joe

///  triumphs@autox.team.net mailing list
///  or try  http://www.team.net/cgi-bin/majorcool
///  Archives at http://www.team.net/archive


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>