My bad. Thats what I meant.
"Bowen, Patrick" <pbowen@intellinetics.com> on 11/29/2000 08:14:17 AM
To: "'naldous@ccgmail.com'" <naldous@ccgmail.com>, Randall Young
<randallyoung@earthlink.net>
cc: pethier%isd.net%CCG@com, triumphs%autox.team.net%CCG@com
Subject: RE: RotoFlex Suspension
HMMWVs actually use CV joints the whole way around.
Patrick Bowen
-----Original Message-----
From: naldous@ccgmail.com [mailto:naldous@ccgmail.com]
Sent: Wednesday, November 29, 2000 8:07 AM
To: Randall Young
Cc: pethier%isd.net%CCG@com; triumphs%autox.team.net%CCG@com
Subject: Re: RotoFlex Suspension
What about the use of spindles like are used in IRS front whell drive cars
or in Humvees? Too complex of a setup?
Randall Young <randallyoung@earthlink.net>@autox.team.net on 11/29/2000
01:26:17 AM
Please respond to Randall Young <randallyoung@earthlink.net>
Sent by: owner-triumphs@autox.team.net
To: Phil Ethier <pethier@isd.net>
cc: triumphs@autox.team.net
Subject: Re: RotoFlex Suspension
Phil Ethier wrote:
>
> From: naldous@ccgmail.com <naldous@ccgmail.com>
>
> >I would think that a lot of torque and horsepower would be lost through
the
> >rubber rotoflex.
>
> Lost where? I mean, where would it go?
What little is lost, is lost in stretching the rubber, which always
takes a little more energy than what it 'gives back' when it returns to
it's original shape. The loss goes to heat, heating the rubber. As I
said before, it sure isn't much, or the rubber would melt.
> And do you think that Lotus would stand for that?
I'm sure Lotus understands the engineering tradeoffs as well as anyone,
but I've never heard that they were 'into' ultra-low-loss drivetrains.
I thought they concentrated more on handling, which is why you very
rarely see a Lotus at the drag strip <g>
Randall
|