| To: | "Jack W. Drews" <vinttr4@geneseo.net> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: 4.3 ltr. Triumph |
| From: | "derek evans" <derek_evans@yahoo.com> |
| Date: | Mon, 28 Aug 2000 20:14:18 +0930charset="iso-8859-1" |
| Cc: | <triumphs@autox.team.net> |
| References: | <4.2.2.20000825065502.00a2b4c0@r1.mail.virginia.edu> <39A6E9BB.BE936DEF@geneseo.net> |
>The popular conversion for more horsepower seems to be V6's or V8's. I wonder >if anybody has tried a newer straight six - there are several around that >have lots more hp than the Triumph, and it would seem that the steering >column and other pieces wouldn't be disturbed so much. good point, the Nissan 3.0 litre straight six is my favourite, most likely too long though. derek __________________________________________________ http://im.yahoo.com |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: TR3 Windshield Stanchions, KTRIUMPH |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: German Female Undies And spellings?, Keith A. Edwards |
| Previous by Thread: | RE: 4.3 ltr. Triumph, David Massey |
| Next by Thread: | Re: 4.3 ltr. Triumph, Bob Lang |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |