triumphs
[Top] [All Lists]
<prev [Date] next>
[Advanced]
 <prev [Thread] next>

Re: 4.3 ltr. Triumph

from [Joe Curry] [Permanent Link][Original]
To: "Jack W. Drews" <vinttr4@geneseo.net>
Subject: Re: 4.3 ltr. Triumph
From: Joe Curry <spitlist@gte.net>
Date: Fri, 25 Aug 2000 17:49:43 -0700
Cc: "R. John Lye" <rjl6n@server1.mail.virginia.edu>, "T.R. Householder" <trhouse@greenapple.com>, triumphs@autox.team.net, fot@autox.team.net
References: <4.2.2.20000825065502.00a2b4c0@r1.mail.virginia.edu> <39A6E9BB.BE936DEF@geneseo.net> 


"Jack W. Drews" wrote:
>
> The popular conversion for more horsepower seems to be V6's or V8's. I wonder
> if anybody has tried a newer straight six - there are several around that
> have lots more hp than the Triumph, and it would seem that the steering
> column and other pieces wouldn't be disturbed so much.


The 4 Liter straight 6 in my wife's Jeep puts out lots of power, but It sure is 
Looooooong!  I wonder if it would fit!

Joe (C)
[More with this subject...]
<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Previous by Date:  Fw: wheels, Fred Thomas
Next by Date:  Re: 4.3 ltr. Triumph, Herald948
Previous by Thread:  Re: 4.3 ltr. Triumph, Jack W. Drews
Next by Thread:  Re: 4.3 ltr. Triumph, Herald948
Indexes:  [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]