spitfires
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: Was: Oil preferences Now: 1600cc's

To: "Mitchell, Douglas (D.B.)" <dmitchel@ford.com>
Subject: Re: Was: Oil preferences Now: 1600cc's
From: Joe Curry <spitlist@gte.net>
Date: Fri, 12 May 2000 07:26:34 -0700
Caught me!  My fingers don't work as fast as my brain sometimes.  THe trailing 
6 was left over from the 1296 listing, but what's 3 cc
among friends!  :)

Joe

"Mitchell, Douglas (D.B.)" wrote:
> 
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Joe Curry [mailto:spitlist@gte.net]
> > Sent: Thursday, May 11, 2000 4:26 PM
> > To: Roger Elliott
> > Cc: Bill Miller; spitfires@autox.team.net
> > Subject: Re: Was: Oil preferences Now: 1600cc's
> >
> >
> >
> > Roger, Actually it goes back even further than that.  The
> > roots of that engine were in the Standard Eight which had an
> > 803 cc version.
> >
> > The bore was 58 mm with a stroke of 76 mm
> >
> > The 948 was a bored out version of the 803 (63 x 76 mm)
> >
> > Then came the 1147 (69.3 x 76 mm)
> > 1296 (73.7 x 76)
> >
> > After that, it was determined that they could not safely
> > increase the bore so to increase the displacement, they could
> > only tackle the
> > stroke.  So the 1500 (actually 1496) has a bore of 73.7 mm
> > and a stroke of 87.5 mm.
> >
> > Joe
> >
> 
> Joe,
> 
> Actually it is 1493 cc engine, not 1496.
> 
> But I am sure that you knew this, just that your fingers have
> a mind of their own. ;)
> 
> Doug Mitchell
> mailto:dbmitchell@bigfoot.com
> '73 Spitfire 1493 (temporarily (since 1981) Spitfire 1296)

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>