Re: Mark II vs 1500

["Laura G." <savercool@email.msn.com>]

Ouch!

Oh Kirk! How can you be so cruel to the 1500?

I just know that I love them both!

Laura G. and Nigel (1500)
-----Original Message-----
From: Kirk Crawford <kirk.crawford@beachnet.com>
To: Mark Gardner <mrgrdnr@ix.netcom.com>
Cc: spitfires@autox.team.net <spitfires@autox.team.net>
Date: Friday, May 21, 1999 9:00 PM
Subject: Re: Mark II vs 1500


>
>I too vote for Mk2.
>it stacks up like this for me:
>Mk2                            1500
>---                            ----
>No power sucking smog Stuff   LOTS of power sucking smog stuff
>No Smog Tests to take.        Still have to pass smog
>Beautiful round tail          Ugly square tail.
>Beautiful chrome Bumpers      Ugly black rubber bumpers
>Smaller Motor                 Larger Motor Needed to make up for Smog Stuff
>Tail lamps that break off     Recessed tail lamps
> when you look at them cross
> ways
>Simple engine and Electrics   Complex engine and Electrics
>Generator (Bummer)            Alternator (Yea!)
> (Can be swapped)
>Positive Ground :-(           Negative Ground :-)
> (can be switched)
>
>Kirk Crawford
>mailto:kirk.crawford@beachnet.com
>http://www.beachnet.com/~crawford/
>