To: | Mark Gardner <mrgrdnr@ix.netcom.com> |
---|---|
Subject: | Re: Mark II vs 1500 |
From: | "Kirk Crawford" <kirk.crawford@beachnet.com> |
Date: | Fri, 21 May 1999 20:59:27 -0500 |
I too vote for Mk2. it stacks up like this for me: Mk2 1500 --- ---- No power sucking smog Stuff LOTS of power sucking smog stuff No Smog Tests to take. Still have to pass smog Beautiful round tail Ugly square tail. Beautiful chrome Bumpers Ugly black rubber bumpers Smaller Motor Larger Motor Needed to make up for Smog Stuff Tail lamps that break off Recessed tail lamps when you look at them cross ways Simple engine and Electrics Complex engine and Electrics Generator (Bummer) Alternator (Yea!) (Can be swapped) Positive Ground :-( Negative Ground :-) (can be switched) Kirk Crawford mailto:kirk.crawford@beachnet.com http://www.beachnet.com/~crawford/ |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | Mark II vs 1500, Mark Gardner |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Help!!!Carbon Fouling, LARRY ELSWICK |
Previous by Thread: | Mark II vs 1500, Mark Gardner |
Next by Thread: | Re: Mark II vs 1500, Joe Curry |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |