But, but.... I wouldn't even want a new Spitfire-unless it were exactly like
the old one! I really hate these new styling updates-the new Chrysler comes
to mind. The revival T-Bird is only o.k. But I think it's better than the
new MG-I think I heard that it was somewhere inthe $30,000 range. Some
automotive wag had made a comment that a nicer new MG-and cheaper, wuld be
to get the body panels from BMH and build it yourself! (Must hae been
someone from Car and Driver)
No, I'll stick with the old stuff. But, then, I _am_ a Cancer -"with these
people, if it's old it has value; if it's new it's suspect." <g>
Egg-zack-ly!
Laura G. and Nigel
-----Original Message-----
From: Simmons, Reid W <reid.w.simmons@intel.com>
To: richard jackson <richard.jackson@northampton.ac.uk>
Cc: Spitfire Mail List <spitfires@autox.team.net>
Date: Thursday, May 13, 1999 9:10 AM
Subject: RE: new mg
>
>WHOW!! Say what?? A NEW Spitfire?? You MUST be pulling our collective
>legs: :)
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
>From: richard jackson [mailto:richard.jackson@northampton.ac.uk]
>Sent: Thursday, May 13, 1999 1:22 AM
>Cc: Spitfire Mail List
>Subject: Re: new mg
>
>
>
>Why Not??? Anyway, why are we all talking about the'new' Mg when there's
the
>NEW Spitfire being launched in August!
>
>Rich
>
>Huw Upshall wrote:
>
>> Usually, Even if you can't get the car in the states, it's in Canada..
But
>> not even that is true for this beauty. :(
>>
>> On Wed, 12 May 1999, Edward Hamilton wrote:
>>
>> >
>> > I am sitting in a hotel room in Zurich at the moment. Wanted to share
>> > with the group that I happened to get a close look at a current model
>> > MG. Quite a nice car, wish they were in the states, i'd buy one in a
>> > heart beat.
>> >
>> > Ed Hamilton
>> >
>
|