Russ I made my own non oring chain
I took a pick and removed all the orings from an oring chain
it made more RWHP on the dyno ( I think 4hp ) but all the lube
went away very quickly.
Rick
----- Original Message -----
From: "Russel Mack" <rtmack@concentric.net>
To: "Rick Yacoucci" <turborick@TurboRick.com>; ">land-speedautox.team.net"
<land-speed@autox.team.net>; <ardunbill@webtv.net>
Sent: Tuesday, September 03, 2002 7:52 AM
Subject: RE: MC Chain
> Rick:
> somebody on the MC Chassis list posted a short table of efficiency
> comparisons for MC drive systems. As I recall, the worst efficiency was
> shaft-drive, and the 2nd-best was o-ring chain. The most efficient (least
> power loss) was "standard" (non-O-ring) chain. Any experience using the
> standard chain on your big-power machines?
> Russ
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: owner-land-speed@autox.team.net
> [mailto:owner-land-speed@autox.team.net]On Behalf Of Rick Yacoucci
> Sent: Tuesday, September 03, 2002 9:50 AM
> To: >land-speedautox.team.net; ardunbill@webtv.net
> Subject: Re: MC Chain
>
>
> Looks like I am the ODDball here. I do not and will not ever use a Tsubaki
> chain
> I have broke 2 low mileage chains and they stretch like crazy.
> I use the RK Oring chains never broke one, they stretch for the first 2
runs
> but after that
> they are low maintenance .These experiences are running these chains on a
> 250hp Hayabusa
> and a 350hp Turbo GSXR1100 so bikes with less hp might be fine with the
> Tsubaki.
>
> Rick
>
>
>
---
Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free.
Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com).
Version: 6.0.384 / Virus Database: 216 - Release Date: 8/26/2002
/// unsubscribe/change address requests to majordomo@autox.team.net or try
/// http://www.team.net/mailman/listinfo
/// Archives at http://www.team.net/archive/land-speed
/// what is needed. It isn't that difficult, folks.
|