To: | az589@lafn.org |
---|---|
Subject: | Re: A cam vs. B cam and More! |
From: | Daniel Neuman <dneuman@quark.sfsu.edu> |
Date: | Mon, 5 Feb 2001 15:04:29 -0800 (PST) |
Hi Stan, It sounds like that C cam would be even less streetable than the B cam. Daniel 69 2000 SF CA > Why stop with the "B" cam instead of the cam from Nissan called "Solex II" > and sometimes referred to as the "C" cam. This cam had more lift and > duration than the "B" cam and had the same base circle diameter so the > rocker geometry was correct. The marking on the Solex II cam was marked > "25510" and was supplied through the Datsun Comp department. These were > not regrinds. > > Stan > SRL311-00037 |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | Re: Engine for custom, Daniel Neuman |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Re: for sale: '66 1600 - San Francisco, Nathan Ruffcorn |
Previous by Thread: | Re: A cam vs. B cam and More!, sidney raper |
Next by Thread: | Ebay Roadster/Brandon Lee?, Nathan Ruffcorn |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |