datsun-roadsters
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: are 1600's the Red headed Step-children?

To: "Datsun Roadsters" <datsun-roadsters@autox.team.net>
Subject: Re: are 1600's the Red headed Step-children?
From: shifty <shifty@well.com>
Date: Fri, 16 Jul 1999 13:25:05 -0700
Go ahead and do what you like, but I think that splitting this list into 
1600 and 2000 groups is a bad idea. Granted, we have a BADROC list, but 
that is for local stuff like where to meet, what time, etc. It just keeps 
the noise traffic down on the main list. (Which I must say is one of the 
best lists I've ever seen. The signal-to-noise ratio is very good, and it 
is a fantastic resource.)

Most of the differences in the cars are in the engines, but information 
about the U20 is generally applicable to the R16 and G-series. (Heck, 
I've bought quite a few books about L series engines to learn general 
information about rebuilding my G). There are very few posts that I don't 
find interesting.

A 1600 website would be a great idea. I've been toying with the idea of 
1500-specific site myself.

Leigh Brooks
San Francisco

On 7/16/99 9:42 AM, eric gilbert wrote:

>i would be willing to start a 1600 sub list or club.
>
>i'm tired of reading the 2000 stuff.  timing chain problems, etc.
>
>do you want to take the ball?
>
>i'll design something.
>
>and i'm not chopping the machine either.  better original.
>
>eric 
>67 1600
>
>

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>