datsun-roadsters
[Top] [All Lists]

Fw: FW: Questions about restoration, and are 1600's the Red headed Step

To: <datsun-roadsters@autox.team.net>
Subject: Fw: FW: Questions about restoration, and are 1600's the Red headed Step-children?
From: "Mark" <mruffcorn@ksni.net>
Date: Fri, 16 Jul 1999 15:29:02 -0500
What's wrong with "R16 Stealth Bombers" as they are QUIETER and almost as
QUICK?

>The only thing wrong with the R16 Fighter Squadron concept (in relation to
U20 Bombers) is
>– aren't fighters supposed to be faster than bombers? ;^ )
>
>(Sorry guys, I just couldn't resist.)
>
>Gary McCormick
>San Jose, CA
>-------------------------------------
>
>Robert.Long@CSDInc.com wrote:
>
>> I gotta agree with Gary, but I sure would like an R16 "Fighter" Squadron
>> shirt to rival those U20 "Bomber" shirts...
>>
>> Robert Long - 67.5 1600 - Albuquerque Fighter Wing
>>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Gary McCormick [mailto:svgkm@halley.ca.essd.northgrum.com]
>> Sent: Friday, July 16, 1999 2:10 PM
>> To: Datsun-Roadsters (E-mail)
>> Subject: Re: Questions about restoration, and are 1600's the Red headed
>> Step-children?
>>
>> Sounds like a  Secessionist movement to me. Didn't we slap one of those
down
>> back in
>> (18)63 or so? ;^ )
>>
>> "We must all hang together, or assuredly we shall all hang separately."
>>           Benjamin Franklin, at the signing of the Declaration of
>> Independence, July 4,
>> 1776
>>
>> Gary McCormick
>> San Jose, CA
>> -----------------------------------
>>
>> eric gilbert wrote:
>>
>> > i would be willing to start a 1600 sub list or club.
>> >
>> > i'm tired of reading the 2000 stuff.  timing chain problems, etc.
>> >
>> > do you want to take the ball?
>> >
>> > i'll design something.
>> >
>> > and i'm not chopping the machine either.  better original.
>> >
>> > eric
>> > 67 1600


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
  • Fw: FW: Questions about restoration, and are 1600's the Red headed Step-children?, Mark <=