"unprepared" is a carryover. Its in the 1994 book that way. --Andy
-----Original Message-----
From: evolution-discussions@yahoogroups.com [mailto:evolution-
Steve,
I believe this is a case where either your interpretation or mine of that
sentence could be a reasonable one, which is why I think it's a problem
in the context of what happened this weekend.
I was on the SEB in '96 when the re-write of 2.1.A went in the rulebook.
Ten years is a long time ago, and I don't recall whether the choice of
the word "unprepared" was discussed or not. I suspect that sentence
may have been a carryover from the previous wording of the rule. I do
believe, however, that if we had intended "unprepared" (as opposed to
"non-Prepared", for example) to refer to Stock and SP cars, we would
have used more specific language. That year's SEB was NOTHING if
not anal about rulebook language. :-)
|