autox
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: Need help classing Lotus

To: autox@autox.team.net
Subject: Re: Need help classing Lotus
From: Lonnie Heston <lhheston@yahoo.com>
Date: Sun, 3 Jun 2001 21:43:44 -0700 (PDT)
>Pat Kelly <lollipop@ricochet.net> sez...
>   In my opinion, some cars are not stock. 
>
 
I disagree, if it hasn't been changed from the
manufacturer's specs, its still stock.

<snip>

>...but allow them to run in Prepared and Modified,
>since both categories need some new "blood" added. 
>Few of the Prepared- and Modified-classed cars are
>driven on the street anyway.  Hmmm, there is one DM 7
>in San Diego that is, most every day, very fast.

That would be a nice sight to see.

>   But I'm not a rule writer...
>---Pat K

Me neither, it's hard enough to read them.  This
thread has intrigued me enough to pick up the rule
book.  IMHO, the SEB should consider adding something
to throw unclassified cars into AS, SS, or ASP based
on a three level cube/weight/intake system breakdown
(sorta like the SM limits) until they are classified. 


If you throw them into AP or D or EMod, there are a
lot of "safety items" that would trip up a "stock"
car.  Production classes may be affected by the 3000
per year manufacturing limit, also.

This is not the first I have heard this kind of
discussion and I just got back into this in '99.  The
SIIR paragraph 3.2 says the SEB will classify a car as
soon as "sufficient information" is available.  They
haven't, so are they breaking the rules??  

=====
Lonnie Heston -- Wichita Region 
Civic DX '87 (runs, for sale)
Civic CRX SI '86 (Yoks on, Koni's arrived)
Civic CRX '85 (runs, parts or cheap resale car)
Fiat 124 Spyder '74 (nearing construction)
Chevy G20 raised-roof, Saturn SL1 '99 (family cars)
Wichita Region SCCA - http://wichitascca.org/
Get personalized email addresses from Yahoo! Mail - only $35 
a year!  http://personal.mail.yahoo.com/

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>