Re: SP Proposal

To:	Joshua Hadler <jhadler@rmi.net>
Subject:	Re: SP Proposal
From:	Craig Blome <cblome@yahoo.com>
Date:	Fri, 2 Apr 1999 11:54:23 -0800 (PST)

--- Joshua Hadler <jhadler@rmi.net> wrote:
> Kent Rafferty wrote:
> > 
> Why not bump the X1/9 into
> CSP? Obviously
> it's the dominant car in DSP. 

Heck, why not bump the carb'd X1/9's to DS with the FI
ones?  Oh wait, they *did* that already... :-P

Craig "drove the X to work today" B.

<Prev in Thread]	Current Thread	[Next in Thread>
Re: SP Proposal, (continued) Re: SP Proposal, Jay Mitchell Re: SP Proposal, Scotty BOB* White* RE: SP Proposal, Kevin Stevens Re: SP Proposal, Joshua Hadler Re: SP Proposal, Jay Mitchell Re: SP Proposal, Scotty BOB* White* Re: SP Proposal, Scotty BOB* White* Re: SP Proposal, Jay Mitchell Re: SP Proposal, Steven N. Burkett Re: SP Proposal, Jay Mitchell Re: SP Proposal, Craig Blome <= Re: SP Proposal, gene Re: SP Proposal, Jay Mitchell Re: SP Proposal, CCoxx Re: SP Proposal, Sam Strano SP Proposal, Adam Popp Re: SP Proposal, Wes Shew SP Proposal, Adam Popp Re: SP Proposal, Craig Blome Re: SP Proposal, Scotty BOB* White* Re: SP Proposal, Bruce Wentzel

Previous by Date:	HELP DSM'ers! or anyone else..., May I Pas
Next by Date:	RE: HELP DSM'ers! or anyone else..., Mohler, Jeff
Previous by Thread:	Re: SP Proposal, Jay Mitchell
Next by Thread:	Re: SP Proposal, gene
Indexes:	[Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]