autox
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: Mustang vs Camaro

To: "John Whitling" <alliancemillsoft@worldnet.att.net>,
Subject: Re: Mustang vs Camaro
From: "Jay Mitchell" <jemitchell@compuserve.com>
Date: Thu, 4 Mar 1999 10:00:08 -0600
John Whitling said:

>Actually, Jeff, the IRS should help the Mustang considerably on
even glass
>smooth surfaces. This is because the inside tire won't be
unloaded nearly so
>much.

Is there a difference in wheel rates between live axle and IRS
cars? This would be the only means whereby this could happen.
There's nothing intrinsic in IRS that would tend to reduce
unloading of the inside tire. Matter of fact, the camber
characteristics of a live axle are superior for getting the
inside wheel to do its share of the work. This is why De Dion
suspensions were invented.

> This means better hook up out of corners, which is generally
the
>biggest problem with FS cars.

I can't say from personal experience, but it is my impression
that the Mustang's biggest problems in FS came from the front
end, not the rear, ergo the IRS won't be all that helpful. Any
'Stangers care to comment here?

Jay




<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>