autox
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: Mustang vs Camaro

To: autox@autox.team.net
Subject: Re: Mustang vs Camaro
From: Tommy Regan <tommy_regan@yahoo.com>
Date: Fri, 5 Mar 1999 12:28:07 -0800 (PST)
FWIW, the Camaro SS doesn't have any more power than an F-Stock Camaro
can get.  The intake hasn't proven to be any better than the non-SS
stuff.  The only advantages are (debatably) 17" wheels which are wider
(9") and the options for stiffer springs and maybe sway bars....all of
which may compare very well to FS-legal 1LE equipped cars.

Of course, the LS1 cars have power all over any other FS car followed
by DOHC Cobras and LT1's, which are very close in hp, but not in torque.

My $.02,
Tommy


---Fedja Jeleskovic <Fedja_Jeleskovic@pictel.com> wrote:
>
> 
> 
> >I'll make a guess that it was for the greater good of the class. 
Right
> now
> >you can be competitive for $7-11K (used 88-95 Camaro?).  The SS
version
> has
> >more HP, stiffer springs, 17 in wheels (although it's been argued
the 16's
> >are actually better), sway bars(?), etc.  If you put the new IRS
Mustang
> >and SS Camaro in FS, most people will shy away from the class since
the
> >perception will be you need a $25k+ car to win.  As someone with
HP/RWD
> >envy, I'd like to jump in that relatively cheap pond next year, but
not if
> >it becomes a country club pool.  (where did THAT analogy come
from?)  <g>
> 
> Well, I was told that 1LE Camaro is actually better then SS camaro
in stock
> form. You do have more power from SS, but 1LE guys can use it much
better
> (put more down)! So, in this case you don't have to go all the way
up there
> an buy the most expensive model in order to be competitive in FS.
> 
> 
> Fedja
> 95 AWD
> #34 ESP
> 
> 
> 
> 

==
Tommy Regan
'87 Mustang CP #16
Austin, Texas




<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>