Cheers for that, Phil. Sure hope summer comes soon. People got
way too much time on their hands to think rationally, IMNSHO.
Bruce
Of course, if Scotty thinks they're not legal, then I might have
to change my mind ;)
-----Original Message-----
From: Phil Ethier <pethier@isd.net>
To: Wes Shew <schumi@vcn.bc.ca>; Mark J Bradakis
<mjb@autox.team.net>
Cc: Team dot net <autox@autox.team.net>; Bruce Wentzel
<greendot@excelonline.com>
Date: Wednesday, February 10, 1999 8:55 PM
Subject: Re: Speed-bleeders stock legal?
>I'd consider a protest on this to be a candidate for the
all-time champion
>wienie protest.
>
>Phil Ethier Saint Paul Minnesota USA
>Lotus Europa, VW Quantum Syncro, Chev Suburban
>LOON, TCVWC, MAC
>pethier@isd.net http://www.visi.com/mac/
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From: Wes Shew <schumi@vcn.bc.ca>
>To: Mark J Bradakis <mjb@autox.team.net>
>Cc: Team dot net <autox@autox.team.net>; Bruce Wentzel
><greendot@excelonline.com>
>Date: Wednesday, February 10, 1999 3:48 PM
>Subject: Speed-bleeders stock legal?
>
>
>>On Wed, 10 Feb 1999, Mark J Bradakis wrote:
>>
>>> These are not a convenience item. You could argue that they
are not a
>>> performance advantage, but would need to have that in writing
from the
>SEB. Or
>>> you might want to make a general proposal, but I would bet
they would not
>>> approve it. More red tape.
>>> >
>>> > That's exactly why I recently ordered a set of the
Speedbleeder screws.
>So
>>> > that I could easily, by myself, bleed the brakes as
frequently as I
>feel I
>>> >
>>> > Any more thoughts on whether or not the speedbleeders are
legal to use
>in
>>> > Stock Class? _I_ certainly would consider them a
"convenience" item.
>>
>>How would one argue they are not convenience items?
>>
>>--
>>Yours in motorsport, Wesley E. Shew [ macher ;-) ]
>>#99 AS 1991 PORSCHE 944 S2 cpe 3.0L(M030&LSD)Indischrot/Schwarz
Kunstleder
>> #53 DSP 1980 VW Scirocco Mk.I, 1.6L bal.& blueprt, Platinum
Grey Metallic
>> SCCA (NWR) & PCA (CWR) Vancouver, Canada (604)737-7649
schumi@vcn.bc.ca
>>
>
>
>
|