6pack
[Top] [All Lists]

RE: Electronic ignition

To: 6pack <6pack@autox.team.net>, SamuelsMA@aol.com
Subject: RE: Electronic ignition
From: "Shawn J. Loseke" <sloseke@holly.colostate.edu>
Date: Sat, 1 Oct 2005 17:58:09 -0600
>===== Original Message From SamuelsMA@aol.com =====
>List members:
>
>One of the reasons I purchased my '76 recently was an extensive list of
>engine modifications including a complete engine rebuild, a balanced and
>lightened flywheel, cylinder head porting, "bowl work" (whatever that means), 
a
>high-performance cam, headers, a 9.5 to 1 compression ratio, cold-air 
induction,
>and a new radiator.  The previous owner claims that the car makes about 145  
hp
>at the flywheel, which seems about right as acceleration is comparable to the
> '70 PI which I used to own.
>
>Anyway, I was looking under the hood the other day and realized that
>something I expected was missing--there was no electronic ignition box 
screwed  onto
>the side of the engine compartment.  My '70 had this  modification.  I took
>off the distributor cap, and it looks to me like a  regular breaker/points
>system.  I admit that I haven't ever seen one  before, but it looks like the 
photo
>in the Haynes manual.
>
>My question is:  Is a conversion to electronic ignition pretty  universal at
>this point, or is it unnecessary if the original type system is  functioning
>well?  What are the differences in maintenance?  The  manual discusses
>examining the condition of the points from time to time to look  for wear or 
pitting.
>If this is a once or twice a year thing, I don't  mind, but if a conventional
>ignition system will be a constant headache, I will  switch it over using an
>MSD system or the like.
>
>Thanks.
>
>Michael
>'76 Tahiti Blue
>CF 57044U

There is nothing inherently wrong with the points system. Other than it being 
considered a consumable. Electronic ignition can allow for smoother idle, 
easier starting and in some cases cover up for the inaccuracy of a worn 
distributor. Going to something like the MSD box can allow for more spark 
which can allow for altered timing etc... stuff that could be beneficial 
depending upon the needs of your engines camshaft and the resulting flow 
capabilites from lift, duration and the amount of head machining. At least 
that's how I understand it.

Shawn J. Loseke
Fort Collins, CO
http://www.triumphowners.com/79   (1972 TR6)
http://www.triumphowners.com/690  (1980 TR8)




<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>