Skip Gurnee wrote:
>
> Hmm-forward holes for the steering rack? In mine, it caused the
> steering arms to be angled much too far to the rear, maybe 20 degrees!
> Bump steer was minimized by moving the rack vertically, not
> horizontally.
This is correct: bump steer is cured by moving the rack vertically.
Could there be differences in frames???
I doubt it at least the chassis are the same for various Vixens where
the
rack mounts but there are some other wierd differences occasionaly.
Regards,
JU
> Best,
> Skip
>
> Dr John Upham wrote:
> >
> > Skip,
> > How much space frame twist is there with 230bhp (although the
> > torque figure is more relevant)?
> >
> > I'd guess most of the twist is in the middle section but a decent
> > roll cage should stiffen it up properly. I assume you do have
> > a roll cage rather than just a roll hoop?
> >
> > Whilst I''ve been rebuilding my Vixen S3 I've bought an Impreza
> > WRX which is quite amusing but not as much fun as the TVR.
> >
> > Where do you get your BDA parts from?
> >
> > Regards,
> >
> > John Upham
> >
> > Skip Gurnee wrote:
> > >
> > > Steve-
> > > Dare I quote the old adage about "speed costs money how fast, etc.? The
> > > money you spend will be somewhat dependent on your plans for the car and
> > > how long you intend to keep it. If it's a lifelong venture like my
> > > Vixen, then do whatever you want without regard to resale value. If you
> > > have thoughts of selling it someday, then I second Bob's vote about
> > > changing engines. I also second Will's thoughts about other
> > > modifications required. My car is running a 230hp Cosworth BD engine,
> > > and EVERYTHING has been changed in the suspension and drive train to
> > > support it. The total cost is several times what you're considering.
> > > The TVR can handle 175hp, but the drive train will see a large
> > > percentage increase in stress, with consequent increase in breakage
> > > possibilities. The mods on my car didn't come all at once; they came as
> > > a result of fixing the "next weakest link".
> > > By the way, the money and frustration are forgotten when the car stays
> > > together and you win.
> > > Best,
> > > Skip Gurnee
> > > 1970 Vixen S2 LVX14704
> > >
> > > "Hill, Stephen M EDUC:EX" wrote:
> > > >
> > > > I have been researching what can be done to warm up my stock TR6 engined
> > > > 1972 TVR, which as folks know is only 106 hp stock. I have triple
>webers on
> > > > it, a header, and I am acquiring pieces and info to go the rest of the
>way.
> > > > The more research I do, the more I realise how difficult and expensive
>it
> > > > will be to get a realiable 175 hp out of it, and I am wondering if I
>will be
> > > > happy with that amount of hp. Perhaps I should go the Rover aluminum V8
> > > > route, or maybe a late Ford 5.0 litre mustang setup. I figure if I dump
> > > > $3000 into the TR6 engine and am not happy with the results, I will be
> > > > pissed off. I am also starting to realise that the car would be worth
>more
> > > > for resale with a V8 than with with a hot TR6 engine. Comments??
> > > >
> > > > Stephen
> > > > 1972 2500 TVR
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > Dr John Upham, The UKMotorSport Index,
> > http://www.ukmotorsport.com/, webmaster@ukmotorsport.com,
> > Voice: +44 (0) 976 634 053 (W), Voice: +44 (0) 125 287 2551 (H),
> > Voice: +44 (0) 976 634 053 (M)
--
Dr John Upham, The UKMotorSport Index,
http://www.ukmotorsport.com/, webmaster@ukmotorsport.com,
Voice: +44 (0) 976 634 053 (W), Voice: +44 (0) 125 287 2551 (H),
Voice: +44 (0) 976 634 053 (M)
|