I believe that is true for all of California as I don't have to have
seat belts on my 1934 Singer. I don't even have to have the brake
lights or rear lights on my car, the lady at the DMV just said be
prepared to be stopped by every officer who sees the car without rear
lights and be prepared to prove that it did not have them originally, of
course I am putting on rear lights and brake lights :)
Both my 34's will have seat belts just like my 53 did, I like seat
belts in my wood covered by a beer can cars. My 67 Dino does not have
to have belts either, but I put them in already.
mike
On Fri, 2009-03-06 at 08:40 -0800, Kirk Hargreaves wrote:
> In my area of the world, Vacaville, which is about 40 miles West of
> Sacramento. . . a car built before 1967 does not need to have seat belts. I
> have confirmed this with a few local cops. I have seat belts, but if I
> happen to jump in and drive to the store without them, I am not breaking the
> law.
>
> I was surprised when I learned this.
>
> Is this true in other parts of the country?
>
> Kirk
> 59BE
> _______________________________________________
> Support Team.Net http://www.team.net/donate.html
>
> You are subscribed as mikey@b2systems.com
>
> http://www.team.net/archive
>
> http://autox.team.net/mailman/listinfo/spridgets
_______________________________________________
Support Team.Net http://www.team.net/donate.html
http://www.team.net/archive
http://autox.team.net/mailman/listinfo/spridgets
|