spridgets
[Top] [All Lists]

RE: front bumber, Yes of No

To: "'Bryan Vandiver'" <Bryan.Vandiver@Eng.Sun.COM>, spridgets@autox.team.net, grbyrns@ucdavis.edu
Subject: RE: front bumber, Yes of No
Date: Tue, 14 Mar 2000 10:01:01 -0800charset="ISO-8859-1"
But they hardly ever do.  Start counting cars with out front plates.  

-----Original Message-----
From Bryan Vandiver [mailto:Bryan.Vandiver at Eng.Sun.COM]
Sent: Tuesday, March 14, 2000 9:39 AM
To: spridgets@autox.team.net; grbyrns@ucdavis.edu
Subject: Re: front bumber, Yes of No


I for got to add...
The CHP, can cite you for not having a front licence plate though:-(

 - Bryan
 
>To: <spridgets@autox.team.net>
>Subject: front bumber, Yes of No
>MIME-Version: 1.0 charset="iso-8859-1"
>X-Priority: 3
>X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
>X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.00.2919.6600
>
>My '59 Bugeye is currently without a front bumper.  I don't have one and
>currently don't intend ever to get one.
>
>Is this legal in Calif.?  Did the bugeyes come this way in this country?
>Most important question is....  Can I BS the CHP with a story about how
they
>came this way and it would screw up the 'originality' of it if I put one
on?
>
>I like the look without it, the 'grinning frog' look is better without the
>bumper to muck it up.  In my case, the red air horn is visible through the
>grille and looks like the frog's tongue.  I've no safety concerns that the
>original bumper could alleviate.
>
>
>Glen Byrns
>'59 Bugeye
>various other boring cars
>

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>