spridgets
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: mechanical advance

To: Jeff Boatright <jboatri@emory.edu>
Subject: Re: mechanical advance
From: Ulix Goettsch <ulix@u.washington.edu>
Date: Wed, 26 May 1999 22:47:50 -0700 (PDT)
Cc: spridgets@autox.team.net
In-reply-to: <l03110704b3721ff22fef@[170.140.244.186]>
Reply-to: Ulix Goettsch <ulix@u.washington.edu>
Sender: owner-spridgets@autox.team.net
Jeff,
supposedly, your gas mileage won't be a s good.
I think that is the only purpose of the vacuum advance/retard units
(probably emissions too).
Ulix

On Wed, 26 May 1999, Jeff Boatright wrote:

> Dear Listers,
> 
> Is there an advantage/disadvantage to an all-mechanical advance distributor
> vs the more common combination mechanical plus vacuum?
> 
> Jeff
> 
> Jeffrey H. Boatright, PhD
> Senior Editor, Molecular Vision
> http://www.molvis.org/molvis
> "Seeing the Future in a Very Tiny Way"
> 
> 

    Ulix                                       __/__,__      ___/__|__  
..............................................(_o____o_)....<_O_____O_/...
                                              '67 Sprite     '74 X1/9


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>