To: | Jeff Boatright <jboatri@emory.edu> |
---|---|
Subject: | Re: mechanical advance |
From: | Frank Clarici <spritenut@Exit109.com> |
Date: | Wed, 26 May 1999 23:21:12 -0400 |
Cc: | spridgets@autox.team.net |
Organization: | Positive Earth Drivers Club |
References: | <l03110704b3721ff22fef@[170.140.244.186]> |
Reply-to: | Frank Clarici <spritenut@Exit109.com> |
Sender: | owner-spridgets@autox.team.net |
Jeff Boatright wrote: > > Dear Listers, > > Is there an advantage/disadvantage to an all-mechanical advance distributor > vs the more common combination mechanical plus vacuum? > I like the full centrifical advance personally. It just feels snapier! I even prefer these to the Mallory dual point. I took the dual point out and popped in a Lucas full centrifical with Cooper "S" points. Cooper points have a stronger spring rating. Did anyone ever try to get a dual point dizzy set perfect? I am no engineer, nor an electrician, not even a plumber so my technical answer is still "I just feels snapier!" -- Frank Clarici Toms River, NJ Bugeye Sprite 67 Sprite 59 A40 http://www.exit109.com/~spritenut/ |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | British Car Week, Jeff Boatright |
---|---|
Next by Date: | My Daughter, My Sprite, Frank Clarici |
Previous by Thread: | mechanical advance, Jeff Boatright |
Next by Thread: | Re: mechanical advance, Ulix Goettsch |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |