- 1. MGB Negative Camber (score: 1)
- Author: Larry Hoy <larryhoy@cwix.com>
- Date: Sun, 11 Apr 1999 22:00:18 -0600
- Is anyone out there using negative camber wishbone arms on an MGB? I was wondering what the camber is with these arms (if there are various types of arms I am not aware of them, I saw a set in the Mo
- /html/vintage-race/1999-04/msg00056.html (7,364 bytes)
- 2. Re: MGB Negative Camber (score: 1)
- Author: RodsINTOMG@aol.com
- Date: Mon, 12 Apr 1999 10:03:52 EDT
- << Is anyone out there using negative camber wishbone arms on an MGB? I was wondering what the camber is with these arms (if there are various types of arms I am not aware of them, I saw a set in the
- /html/vintage-race/1999-04/msg00060.html (8,417 bytes)
- 3. Re: MGB Negative Camber (score: 1)
- Author: Brian Evans <brian@uunet.ca>
- Date: Mon, 12 Apr 1999 10:43:02 -0400
- I would do exactly what Rods suggests. Conventional wisdom suggests 2 - 3 deg negative camber for radial tires, 1 - 1.5 deg negative for bias ply racing tires, as starting points. Brian snipped...etc
- /html/vintage-race/1999-04/msg00063.html (7,936 bytes)
- 4. Re: MGB Negative Camber (score: 1)
- Author: Susan and John Roper <vscjohn@huntnet.net>
- Date: Mon, 12 Apr 1999 13:34:02 -0500
- Larry, when I built my B solo car, several times Sowdiv and regional champ, now a vintage racer out of Dallas, I extended the lower arms beyond the commercially available. Worked. The car handles. If
- /html/vintage-race/1999-04/msg00070.html (7,828 bytes)
- 5. Re: MGB Negative Camber (score: 1)
- Author: Malcolm Cox <malcox@napanet.net>
- Date: Mon, 12 Apr 1999 22:10:50 -0700
- My MGA uses very similar (if not identical) A arms. I use 2.5 degrees negative. A commonly accepted optimal number for the Yokohamas. I tried 5 degrees (supplied hopefully by mistake by an unnamed ve
- /html/vintage-race/1999-04/msg00075.html (7,268 bytes)
This search system is powered by
Namazu