- 1. Re: Verdict (score: 1)
- Author: rwh5633@sudcv91.ed.ray.com (Richard Hesek (432)-5414)
- Date: Wed, 4 Oct 95 07:52:08 EDT
- Mr. D. Perslow commented: "How odd that you post a message and apologize for it at the same time! Seems to me that if you're already sorry while you're posting you have the option of just not sending
- /html/triumphs/1995-10/msg00090.html (7,150 bytes)
- 2. Re: Verdict (score: 1)
- Author: "Doug Mitchell" <dmitchel@ford.com>
- Date: Wed, 4 Oct 1995 08:49:34 -0400
- Sorry to bomb the whole list with this, but Mr. Hesek's address is not recognized by my server. I tend to agree with Dan, if you have to apologize for the non-LBC content of your message, why bother
- /html/triumphs/1995-10/msg00094.html (7,643 bytes)
- 3. Re: Verdict (score: 1)
- Author: "Chris Kantarjiev" <cak@godzilla.studio.sgi.com>
- Date: Wed, 4 Oct 1995 10:45:24 -0700 "Re: Verdict" (Oct 4, 4:38pm)
- What I care about is whether converting my US-spec TR6 to PI would be a good idea in California. I doubt it would pass the emmission reg's would it, AND if you used the Lucas PI system then it is sup
- /html/triumphs/1995-10/msg00110.html (7,714 bytes)
This search system is powered by
Namazu