Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*260\/289\?\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*260\/289\?\s*$/: 8 ]

Total 8 documents matching your query.

1. 260/289? (score: 1): Author: STUART_BRENNAN@HP-Andover-om3.om.hp.com; Date: Fri, 10 Jan 97 11:03:39 -0700; Item Subject: cc:Mail Text I'd like to respond to this thread, but first I have to mail a letter. I must have another stamp here somewhere....Aha, there's one in the back of Grandpa's old desk. I'll; /html/tigers/1997-01/msg00073.html (7,720 bytes)
2. Re: 260/289? (score: 1): Author: HW200@aol.com; Date: Fri, 10 Jan 1997 13:41:46 -0500 (EST); Only if you collect inverted biplane stamps....I would throw it away (especially after it been licked). The 289 Tiger is a different story.; /html/tigers/1997-01/msg00074.html (6,794 bytes)
3. Re: 260/289? (score: 1): Author: rootes@ix.netcom.com; Date: Fri, 10 Jan 1997 10:52:27 -0800; Hello Stu: To save you the aggravation of a messy lawsuit, I'll be happy to take those messed up inverted bi-plane stamps off your hands! I might be able to find some use for them!!!!!!! Steve Sage; /html/tigers/1997-01/msg00081.html (8,043 bytes)
4. Re: 260/289? (score: 1): Author: Norman Miller <rootes1@best.com>; Date: Fri, 10 Jan 1997 13:30:36 -0800 (PST); You guys don't get it. First of all there is no MK1A. If there were and we accept the lip flapping from those that just have to have something special about their Tigers, you'll be happy to know that; /html/tigers/1997-01/msg00089.html (7,482 bytes)
5. Re: 260/289? (score: 1): Author: ED JAKOBER <JAKOBERE@UWSTOUT.EDU>; Date: Fri, 10 Jan 1997 16:02:53 -0600 (CST); Someone posted some info about some military rust treatment that was available in a spray can (this is all I remember). I accidentaly erased the original post. Could someone send it to me or repost; /html/tigers/1997-01/msg00090.html (6,930 bytes)
6. 260/289? (score: 1): Author: Anita Barrett <anitabrt@mindspring.com>; Date: Fri, 10 Jan 1997 20:30:59 -0500; May I provide some light on the 260, 289 question? Reference HPBooks "How to rebuild your Small Block Ford" Engine year Casting No. Bore Comments 260 62 C3OE-B 3.80 5 bolt bellhousing pattern, 9/16 i; /html/tigers/1997-01/msg00093.html (10,097 bytes)
7. Re[2]: 260/289? (score: 1): Author: nicholsj@oakwood.org; Date: Mon, 13 Jan 97 09:22:38 EST; I hate to flog a dead horse, but why not compare the records of how many 289 engines where ordered and shipped to the number of MkII Tigers built. Subtract the two numbers and subtract the number tha; /html/tigers/1997-01/msg00116.html (8,504 bytes)
8. Re: 260/289? (score: 1): Author: HW200@aol.com; Date: Mon, 13 Jan 1997 13:24:11 -0500 (EST); Bedtime for 289 Mark 1s. ( i'm not gonna call it a 1a). Thanks Norm. Hank; /html/tigers/1997-01/msg00117.html (6,712 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 8
Page: [1]