STUART_BRENNAN@HP-Andover-om3.om.hp.com wrote:
>
> Item Subject: cc:Mail Text
> I'd like to respond to this thread, but first I have to mail a letter.
> I must have another stamp here somewhere....Aha, there's one in the
> back of Grandpa's old desk. I'll just lick it and......OH NO! This
> stamp is no good! The biplane is printed upside down! I'll just have
> to SUE the POST OFFICE to get my money back!!!!! And, if one of the
> coins they give me wasn't pressed exactly on center, then I'll sue
> them again!!!! AND the Treasury!!!
>
> Can anyone answer a couple simple questions? Has any alleged Mk1A 289
> ever had it's motor checked to see if it is one of the 289's sent to
> England for Mk2's? If they weren't, then where did they come from?
> Norman, are you there? Do the TAC guys ever check this?
>
> And if one of these alleged 289's turned out to be the real thing,
> wouldn't that make it just a little more desirable, like the inverted
> biplane stamp?
>
> Stu
Hello Stu:
To save you the aggravation of a messy lawsuit, I'll be happy to take
those messed up inverted bi-plane stamps off your hands! I might be able
to find some use for them!!!!!!!
Steve Sage
|