Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[Tigers\]\s+Pertronix\s+Ignitor\s+Electronic\s+Ignition\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[Tigers\]\s+Pertronix\s+Ignitor\s+Electronic\s+Ignition\s*$/: 7 ]

Total 7 documents matching your query.

1. [Tigers] Pertronix Ignitor Electronic Ignition (score: 1): Author: Paul R Sheahan <sunbeamtiger@prodigy.net>; Date: Fri, 13 Apr 2012 08:48:28 -0700 (PDT); Good Morning, I am considering installing one of these units in one of my Tigers. As simple as it looks, are there any surprises I am not seeing? Paul Paul R Sheahan _________________________________; /html/tigers/2012-04/msg00113.html (11,659 bytes)
2. Re: [Tigers] Pertronix Ignitor Electronic Ignition (score: 1): Author: "Thomas Prager" <tcprager@hotmail.com>; Date: Fri, 13 Apr 2012 11:01:26 -0500; I installed one several years ago and had to take a die grinder to the aluminum base due to clearance problems. However it has worked flawlessly since the install. Hope you don't mind the Chevy cap.; /html/tigers/2012-04/msg00115.html (12,531 bytes)
3. Re: [Tigers] Pertronix Ignitor Electronic Ignition (score: 1): Author: genepadgett@comcast.net; Date: Fri, 13 Apr 2012 16:14:45 +0000 (UTC); Tom, it sounds like maybe you installed their entire distributor system? In my reply I was talking about the version that just replaces the points in the original distributor so there would not be a; /html/tigers/2012-04/msg00116.html (13,252 bytes)
4. Re: [Tigers] Pertronix Ignitor Electronic Ignition (score: 1): Author: "Smit, Theo" <Theo.Smit@dynastream.com>; Date: Fri, 13 Apr 2012 11:18:07 -0500; The Ignitor II has better coil current control... I've heard anecdotally that one misfeature of the original Ignitor is that it can leave the coil current on if you have the ignition on but the engin; /html/tigers/2012-04/msg00117.html (12,786 bytes)
5. Re: [Tigers] Pertronix Ignitor Electronic Ignition (score: 1): Author: "Thomas Witt" <atwittsend@verizon.net>; Date: Fri, 13 Apr 2012 10:57:29 -0700; As someone who has the original Ignitor in another car, I also recommend the improved Ignitor II. It takes a conscience effort to remember NOT to leave the key on when the car isn't running. I'd also; /html/tigers/2012-04/msg00120.html (11,445 bytes)
6. Re: [Tigers] Pertronix Ignitor Electronic Ignition (score: 1): Author: "Rense, Mark (GE, Appl & Light)" <mark.rense@ge.com>; Date: Fri, 13 Apr 2012 19:10:16 +0000; Hey Paul, The hardest part of the Ignitor installation is removing the ballast resistor and re-wiring the hot to the coil, the Ignitor I is pretty much a drop in. Their instructions are reasonable, i; /html/tigers/2012-04/msg00121.html (13,122 bytes)
7. Re: [Tigers] Pertronix Ignitor Electronic Ignition (score: 1): Author: "Buck Trippel" <BuckTrippel@Verizon.net>; Date: Fri, 13 Apr 2012 18:41:03 -0700; I've tried the I, II & III. The biggest surprise I found was that each uses a coil with different resistance for each. You can quickly fry the unit if you use the wrong combination (such as the Pertr; /html/tigers/2012-04/msg00130.html (11,585 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 7
Page: [1]