Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Photographic\s+proof\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Photographic\s+proof\s*$/: 8 ]

Total 8 documents matching your query.

1. Photographic proof (score: 1): Author: Ken Strayhorn <ken@dukecomm.duke.edu>; Date: Tue, 10 Dec 2002 08:52:50 -0500; http://campaign.duke.edu/~ken/hillsboro/triumph.html I took a few photos of my '72 Spit just after I got the engine back in to prove to a couple friends of mine that it was actually running again. Th; /html/spitfires/2002-12/msg00102.html (7,973 bytes)
2. RE: Photographic proof (score: 1): Author: Richard Gosling <richard.gosling@exprogroup.com>; Date: Tue, 10 Dec 2002 14:12:37 -0000; Is that black paint on the number plate panel original? I vaguely remember someone saying that Triumph did this for a year or so, but can't remember the details. Maybe it was a US-market only thing?; /html/spitfires/2002-12/msg00104.html (8,098 bytes)
3. RE: Photographic proof (score: 1): Author: Ken Strayhorn <ken@dukecomm.duke.edu>; Date: Tue, 10 Dec 2002 09:53:12 -0500; Yep, the black rear panel is original. On the two occasions I've had the car painted, I've had to point out to the paint guys to leave it black. I bought the car with 32,000 miles on it from a guy wh; /html/spitfires/2002-12/msg00105.html (8,749 bytes)
4. RE: Photographic proof (score: 1): Author: Douglas Braun <doug@dougbraun.com>; Date: Tue, 10 Dec 2002 11:30:00 -0500; I have a '72 built in October 1971 (FK26439L), and as far as I can tell it never had the black rear panel. But I cannot be 100% certain, since a PO repainted the car. You have the black plastic dashb; /html/spitfires/2002-12/msg00108.html (9,685 bytes)
5. RE: Photographic proof (score: 1): Author: Ken Strayhorn <ken@dukecomm.duke.edu>; Date: Tue, 10 Dec 2002 16:38:16 -0500; At 11:30 AM -0500 12/10/02, Douglas Braun wrote, concerning the oddities of the '72 cars: Yep, and somehow it hasn't cracked. Another odd fact is that all the paint charts I have seen say that color; /html/spitfires/2002-12/msg00110.html (8,685 bytes)
6. Re: Photographic proof (score: 1): Author: "Larry Vaughan" <lvaughan@pldi.net>; Date: Tue, 10 Dec 2002 17:28:19 -0600; I will be starting up a rebuilt motor soon. Is 20-50 the correct break in I have a problem with the motor I am rebuilding. The original Stromberg carb shot a stream of gas out of a hole, but ran if s; /html/spitfires/2002-12/msg00113.html (8,074 bytes)
7. Re: Photographic proof (score: 1): Author: Alan Lemen <ralemen@cableone.net>; Date: Tue, 10 Dec 2002 21:39:28 -0700; Larry I put a pair or twin SU on my car. So have a number of others. Follow the setup instructions for after a rebuild in the manuals ( Haynes or Bentley) and you should not have any trouble. I don't; /html/spitfires/2002-12/msg00114.html (9,618 bytes)
8. Re: Photographic proof (score: 1): Author: tim dafforn <mqbsstrd@man.ac.uk>; Date: Wed, 11 Dec 2002 17:36:31 +0000; Dear Larry, I have a pair of 40DCOE18s on my spit 1500 and found that first start up was really easy with the standard jet settings as per the triumphtune catalogue. It was more trickey to get them t; /html/spitfires/2002-12/msg00117.html (8,799 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 8
Page: [1]