Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TR\]\s+Re\:\s+GT6\+\s+Is\s+Complete\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TR\]\s+Re\:\s+GT6\+\s+Is\s+Complete\s*$/: 3 ]

Total 3 documents matching your query.

1. Re: [TR] Re: GT6+ Is Complete (score: 1): Author: ZoboHerald@aol.com; Date: Sat, 29 Apr 2006 12:47:58 EDT; ...You see the 68 car was White and that is how she is commissioned. However, the 70 car was Signal Red, code # 32, so I took the liberty since I already have 3 other white Triumph's and no #32's. Th; /html/spitfires/2006-04/msg00100.html (7,462 bytes)
2. Re: [TR] Re: GT6+ Is Complete (score: 1): Author: TR250Driver@aol.com; Date: Sat, 29 Apr 2006 15:26:08 EDT; Cool. But "KC51640 LO " would make it a 1969 model GT6+. How is it titled? ;-) Andy, The PO referred to it as a very late 68, therefore a GT6+. I think the MK2's and Plus's started at commission #KC5; /html/spitfires/2006-04/msg00102.html (7,838 bytes)
3. Re: [TR] Re: GT6+ Is Complete (score: 1): Author: TR250Driver@aol.com; Date: Sat, 29 Apr 2006 21:37:30 EDT; So I'd consider any GT6+ a 1969 if KC50001 and above, or 1970 if KC75001 or above. I wonder how yours got titled as a '68 and if it was always titled that way? ==AM== Andy, As far as I know the GT6+; /html/spitfires/2006-04/msg00107.html (7,279 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 3
Page: [1]