- 1. anthropomorpizing (sp?) (score: 1)
- Author: macleodm@cadvision.com (Michael MacLeod)
- Date: Mon, 18 Dec 1995 16:51:51 -0700
- Is it just me? Am I the only one who refuses to encumber an automobile, no matter how cherished, with a name? I may be one of the few owners out there who have owned their treasured car (MGA in this
- /html/mgs/1995-12/msg00358.html (7,189 bytes)
- 2. Re: anthropomorpizing (sp?) (score: 1)
- Author: BLECKSTEIN@SHELL.MONMOUTH.COM
- Date: Mon, 18 Dec 1995 19:18:57 -0500
- practice, as my cars are unnamed except the one (YB) that came directly from England already with a name. The reaction to this discussion was mixed, some with names others without. I believe you or s
- /html/mgs/1995-12/msg00359.html (7,833 bytes)
- 3. Re: anthropomorpizing (sp?) (score: 1)
- Author: ArtBone@aol.com
- Date: Tue, 19 Dec 1995 00:30:59 -0500
- Yes! Art Bone 73 Norton Interstate (The Silver Sow)
- /html/mgs/1995-12/msg00366.html (6,762 bytes)
- 4. Re: anthropomorpizing (sp?) (score: 1)
- Author: Croaker the Physician <markl@us.oracle.com>
- Date: Tue, 19 Dec 95 13:56:53 PST
- Is it just me? Am I the only one who refuses to encumber an automobile, no matter how cherished, with a name? IMHO names are fine as long as they are somewhat self-deprecating, an acknowledgement of
- /html/mgs/1995-12/msg00392.html (7,493 bytes)
This search system is powered by
Namazu