mgs
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: anthropomorpizing (sp?)

To: macleodm@cadvision.com (Michael MacLeod)
Subject: Re: anthropomorpizing (sp?)
From: BLECKSTEIN@SHELL.MONMOUTH.COM
Date: Mon, 18 Dec 1995 19:18:57 -0500

On Mon, 18 Dec 1995, macleodm@cadvision.com (Michael MacLeod) wrote:
>        Is it just me?  Am I the only one who refuses to encumber an
>automobile, no matter how cherished, with a name?
>        I may be one of the few owners out there who have owned their
>treasured car (MGA in this case) for over 20 years.  But, never in all this
>time have I been tempted to baptise my cars, motorbikes, or guitars.
>        I realize I'm not a nurturing new-age kind of guy and probably
>don't belong in the 90's, but, surely there must be other curmudgeons out
>there just like me.
>        Am I a voice crying in the wilderness?
>
>Mike MacLeod
>
>'60 MGA - un-named
>'64 Jag Mk 10 - un-nmaed
>'68 BSA Spitfire - un-named
>'83 BMW R100 RS - un-named.
>
>
>
>Mike, we went through this a few weeks ago. I felt it was more an English 
practice, as my cars are unnamed except the one (YB) that came directly from 
England already with a name. The reaction to this discussion was mixed, some 
with names others without. I believe you or shall I say we are in the majority 
in the States, but again many did reply with names. 

Mike Leckstein 

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>