Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Error\s+in\s+Classic\s+Motorsports\s+MG\s+Article\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Error\s+in\s+Classic\s+Motorsports\s+MG\s+Article\s*$/: 9 ]

Total 9 documents matching your query.

1. Error in Classic Motorsports MG Article (score: 1): Author: Knockoffnut@aol.com; Date: Fri, 2 Apr 2004 17:38:26 EST; I just noticed that in the table on page 36 of the MG article in the latest issue of Classic Motorsports, that they say the model year1967 MG had an all-synchro transmission. I owned a 1967 MG and re; /html/mgs/2004-04/msg00007.html (7,687 bytes)
2. Re: Error in Classic Motorsports MG Article (score: 1): Author: David Councill <dcouncil@imt.net>; Date: Fri, 02 Apr 2004 16:04:22 -0700; You are correct. Perhaps it was a typo error on their part. A car introduced in November 1967 would of course be part of the 1968 production year anyway. And to the best of my knowledge, it was a cle; /html/mgs/2004-04/msg00008.html (8,198 bytes)
3. Re: Error in Classic Motorsports MG Article (score: 1): Author: Max Heim <mvheim@studiolimage.com>; Date: Fri, 02 Apr 2004 15:19:08 -0800; "You don't know what you're talking about!" "It's right here in black and white!" ...and so on. -- Max Heim '66 MGB GHN3L76149 If you're near Mountain View, CA, it's the primer red one with chrome wi; /html/mgs/2004-04/msg00009.html (8,602 bytes)
4. Re: Error in Classic Motorsports MG Article (score: 1): Author: jello@ida.net; Date: Fri, 2 Apr 2004 16:29:19 US/Mountain; I don't know that it is all that clean a split, but generally, the '67 did not have a synchro on first. Also, the conversion to the "tube type" rear axle occurred somewhere between '67 and '68, and a; /html/mgs/2004-04/msg00010.html (8,795 bytes)
5. RE: Error in Classic Motorsports MG Article (score: 1): Author: "Dean T. Lake" <dtlake@erols.com>; Date: Fri, 2 Apr 2004 19:19:07 -0500; My '74 is apparently a three syncro. At least, it sure doesn't seem to want to shift into first! ;-) production all 67; /html/mgs/2004-04/msg00011.html (7,699 bytes)
6. Re: Error in Classic Motorsports MG Article (score: 1): Author: Max Heim <mvheim@studiolimage.com>; Date: Fri, 02 Apr 2004 16:47:22 -0800; Well, if you're going to count that, I now have a 4-synchro in my 66, but it has developed a hitch going from first to second -- if I just operate the clutch pedal by timing ("automatic pilot" mode); /html/mgs/2004-04/msg00013.html (8,377 bytes)
7. Re: Error in Classic Motorsports MG Article (score: 1): Author: Editorgary@aol.com; Date: Fri, 2 Apr 2004 20:10:50 EST; Knockoffnut is correct. ( I know because I wrote the tables.) The note in the MG TIme LIne is accurate regarding the introduction of the all-synchro transmission in Nov. 1967, which would have been o; /html/mgs/2004-04/msg00014.html (8,569 bytes)
8. Re: Error in Classic Motorsports MG Article (score: 1): Author: Michael Ohleger <movlas2@netscape.net>; Date: Sat, 03 Apr 2004 10:02:52 -0500; I owned a 1967 MGB that had a 4 synchro and a tube type rear axle. I know that it was imported from Germany in 1977 (probably by a US serviceman). I also knew that the engine and transmission were OE; /html/mgs/2004-04/msg00016.html (7,672 bytes)
9. Re: Error in Classic Motorsports MG Article (score: 1): Author: Bob Howard <mgbob@juno.com>; Date: Sat, 3 Apr 2004 11:17:26 -0500; The 2nd to 1st shift should be pretty easy if everything mechanical is OK. Inside the gearbox you don't know the condition of synchronisers and forks without exploratory surgery, but one thing you c; /html/mgs/2004-04/msg00019.html (7,760 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 9
Page: [1]