Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*NSU\s+at\s+Bonneville\s+1\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*NSU\s+at\s+Bonneville\s+1\s*$/: 11 ]

Total 11 documents matching your query.

1. NSU at Bonneville 1 (score: 1): Author: "Pork Pie" <pork.pie@t-online.de>; Date: 19 Sep 2005 18:29 GMT; Hi List, if it's too boring on the list, here a nice issue. As I worte before, Heinz Herz, son of the late Wilhelm Herz, who set the first 200+ mph motorcycle record like to come for the 50 annivers; /html/land-speed/2005-09/msg00201.html (8,932 bytes)
2. Re: NSU at Bonneville 1 (score: 1): Author: jkamo@rushmore.com; Date: Mon, 19 Sep 2005 19:41:43 -0600; I asked previously, and I ask again, do you realize that SCTA/BNI/ECTA/FIM/USFRA all do NOT allow for strealining of bike like the NSU, IE for siton bike: no streamlining beyond rear edge of rear tir; /html/land-speed/2005-09/msg00214.html (7,759 bytes)
3. Re: NSU at Bonneville 1 (score: 1): Author: "Pork Pie" <pork.pie@t-online.de>; Date: 20 Sep 2005 20:11 GMT; yes we know this, that a so totally closed streamlined bike is normally not allowed. This is the reason, why Heinz comes over to talk to the inspector how they can allowed to make a anniversary run.; /html/land-speed/2005-09/msg00220.html (8,517 bytes)
4. Re: NSU at Bonneville 1 (score: 1): Author: "Glen Barrett" <speedtimer@charter.net>; Date: Tue, 20 Sep 2005 14:21:35 -0600; Pork Pie I would think SCTA would be proud to let the bike run under time only conditions. It has been done in the past with non class legal vehicles that meet the safety conditions. I will foreward; /html/land-speed/2005-09/msg00221.html (9,419 bytes)
5. Re: NSU at Bonneville 1 (score: 1): Author: "Pork Pie" <pork.pie@t-online.de>; Date: 20 Sep 2005 20:54 GMT; Hi Glen, this is great. Thank you very much. Best wishes and have a save and successful World Final Pork Pie "Glen Barrett" <speedtimer@charter.net> schrieb:; /html/land-speed/2005-09/msg00224.html (7,992 bytes)
6. Re: NSU at Bonneville 1 (score: 1): Author: jkamo@rushmore.com; Date: Tue, 20 Sep 2005 16:36:20 -0600; so if some friends and I wish to build more fully streamlined bikes to our own criteria, such as sit on bike with streamlining enclosing the wheels, and tail sections higher than 36 inches, and more; /html/land-speed/2005-09/msg00225.html (8,910 bytes)
7. Re: NSU at Bonneville 1 (score: 1): Author: Nt788@aol.com; Date: Tue, 20 Sep 2005 19:31:25 EDT; THEREIN LIES THE CATCH! YOU WON'T BE ALLOWED! JACK; /html/land-speed/2005-09/msg00228.html (7,698 bytes)
8. Re: NSU at Bonneville 1 (score: 1): Author: jkamo@rushmore.com; Date: Tue, 20 Sep 2005 17:28:12 -0600; Pork pie, what type of speed is he shooting for?????? Joe :) Quoting Pork Pie <pork.pie@t-online.de>: -- This mail sent by http://webmail.rushmore.com; /html/land-speed/2005-09/msg00230.html (8,396 bytes)
9. RE: NSU at Bonneville 1 (score: 1): Author: "Jon Amo" <webmaster@landracing.com>; Date: Tue, 20 Sep 2005 18:57:42 -0600; IF it met the safety requirements it may be allowed to run. When Mike Corbin ran a electric bike in the 70's he ran time only because there wasn't a class for it. A fully enclose driver on a sit on b; /html/land-speed/2005-09/msg00233.html (7,883 bytes)
10. Re: NSU at Bonneville 1 (score: 1): Author: "Pork Pie" <pork.pie@t-online.de>; Date: 21 Sep 2005 17:43 GMT; flat out...............Pork Pie <jkamo@rushmore.com> schrieb:; /html/land-speed/2005-09/msg00235.html (8,702 bytes)
11. Re: NSU at Bonneville 1 (score: 1): Author: jkamo@rushmore.com; Date: Wed, 21 Sep 2005 18:40:49 -0600; well this should be interesting, I want to run a bike flat out with streamlining that does not meet the streamlining rules toooooooooo................ Joe Quoting Pork Pie <pork.pie@T-Online.de>: --; /html/land-speed/2005-09/msg00239.html (9,183 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 11
Page: [1]