- 1. Ford 9" / posi / floating, etc. (score: 1)
- Author: Ken Bond <kmb2@humboldt.edu>
- Date: Sun, 12 Nov 2000 15:35:50 -0800
- We have decided to put a Ford 9" under the rear of the 85 Vette for running in D/GT... I am not quite sure HOW yet, but we are committed to going there. I have an option to buy EITHER a posi unit or
- /html/land-speed/2000-11/msg00418.html (8,334 bytes)
- 2. Re: Ford 9" / posi / floating, etc. (score: 1)
- Author: "John Beckett" <landspeedracer@email.msn.com>
- Date: Sun, 12 Nov 2000 19:19:31 -0500
- Why not run a spool?? Are you talking about 3's for the 1st gear in the T-10? John Beckett running there. in that
- /html/land-speed/2000-11/msg00420.html (9,286 bytes)
- 3. Re: Ford 9" / posi / floating, etc. (score: 1)
- Author: Ed Van Scoy <edvs@uswest.net>
- Date: Sun, 12 Nov 2000 19:36:07 -0700
- Years ago I called Doc Jeffries and spent some time visiting with him on this very subject. His comment RE the 9 inch was that it ate up too much HP for his tastes. He replaced the IRS in his Vette w
- /html/land-speed/2000-11/msg00422.html (10,407 bytes)
- 4. Re: Ford 9" / posi / floating, etc. (score: 1)
- Author: "Nafzger" <nafzger@vtc.net>
- Date: Sun, 12 Nov 2000 21:17:31 -0700
- I agree that the GM rear uses less horsepower than the Ford 9". The reason is also what makes the ford rear the choice of drag racers. The GM rear is a spiral bevel while the Ford 9" is a deep hypoi
- /html/land-speed/2000-11/msg00423.html (11,777 bytes)
- 5. Re: Ford 9" / posi / floating, etc. (score: 1)
- Author: "Keith Turk" <kturk@ala.net>
- Date: Mon, 13 Nov 2000 03:49:14 -0600
- Ken and I have had this conversation... My Thing remains that the 9" is the Cheapest easiest and most avalible especially when it comes to servicability and swapping gear sets ( outside of the QC ...
- /html/land-speed/2000-11/msg00424.html (13,688 bytes)
This search system is powered by
Namazu