Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Its\s+official\:\s+The\s+GT40\s+is\s+a\s+GO\!\!\!\s*$/: 23 ]

Total 23 documents matching your query.

1. Re: Its official: The GT40 is a GO!!! (score: 1)
Author: james creasy <Black94PGT@pacbell.net>
Date: Tue, 19 Feb 2002 11:57:40 -0800
cool. now somebody please go buy one and drive it in OSP. -james "where'd everybody go?" creasy OSP #74
/html/ba-autox/2002-02/msg00231.html (9,528 bytes)

2. RE: Its official: The GT40 is a GO!!! (score: 1)
Author: "Michael R. Clements" <mrclem@telocity.com>
Date: Tue, 19 Feb 2002 12:13:52 -0800
Awesome! That is one sweet ride. If they did it a couple of years ago I might not have bought the Panoz. --Original Message-- From: owner-ba-autox@autox.team.net [mailto:owner-ba-autox@autox.team.net
/html/ba-autox/2002-02/msg00233.html (10,079 bytes)

3. RE: Its official: The GT40 is a GO!!! (score: 1)
Author: Carl Merritt <CMerritt@luminous.com>
Date: Tue, 19 Feb 2002 12:29:45 -0800
For those of you without the image of the GT40 already firmly in mind: http://www.motortrend.com/jan02/gt40/gt40_f.html -Carl
/html/ba-autox/2002-02/msg00234.html (11,323 bytes)

4. Re: Its official: The GT40 is a GO!!! (score: 1)
Author: james creasy <Black94PGT@pacbell.net>
Date: Tue, 19 Feb 2002 12:28:34 -0800
OSP - Only Snakes Permitted http://thevenom.net/forum/viewthread.php?tid=49 OSP - Overpowered Snake Playground? -james c OSP #74 -- Original Message -- From: "Chris Warner" <jabrwoky@pacbell.net> To
/html/ba-autox/2002-02/msg00235.html (11,343 bytes)

5. Re: Its official: The GT40 is a GO!!! (score: 1)
Author: james creasy <Black94PGT@pacbell.net>
Date: Tue, 19 Feb 2002 12:39:52 -0800
i dont think its cheap though. quite a bit more than a WRX or even a -james c
/html/ba-autox/2002-02/msg00237.html (11,996 bytes)

6. Re: Its official: The GT40 is a GO!!! (score: 1)
Author: Darren Madams <darren@madams.com>
Date: Tue, 19 Feb 2002 13:19:43 -0800 (PST)
Cool looking? Yes. Authentic/retro looking? Yes. Would I buy one/ do I care that they're going to make it? No. $100k buys you a hotrodded Mustang motor in a slick chassis? Give me the Elise (with a d
/html/ba-autox/2002-02/msg00238.html (12,814 bytes)

7. RE: Its official: The GT40 is a GO!!! (score: 1)
Author: "Michael R. Clements" <mrclem@telocity.com>
Date: Tue, 19 Feb 2002 13:18:38 -0800
True; I heard low 6 figures in price. However, it should be a no-brainer decision for anybody shopping in that price range, compared to the other options available. --Original Message-- From: owner-b
/html/ba-autox/2002-02/msg00239.html (12,629 bytes)

8. RE: Its official: The GT40 is a GO!!! (score: 1)
Author: "Michael R. Clements" <mrclem@telocity.com>
Date: Tue, 19 Feb 2002 13:49:49 -0800
If your point is that all 6-figure cars are outlandish and less expensive cars provide more bang for the buck, then I agree. A Boxster or Vette provides more performance per dollar. But 500 hp. in a
/html/ba-autox/2002-02/msg00241.html (13,775 bytes)

9. Re: Its official: The GT40 is a GO!!! (score: 1)
Author: james creasy <Black94PGT@pacbell.net>
Date: Tue, 19 Feb 2002 14:23:27 -0800
or you could do 550 hp in a *2200* lb car for under $20K. plus its easy on the eyes. a little wrenching is involved. www.factoryfive.com borden would routinely paste the super bikes on the freeway w
/html/ba-autox/2002-02/msg00243.html (15,272 bytes)

10. RE: Its official: The GT40 is a GO!!! (score: 1)
Author: "Michael R. Clements" <mrclem@telocity.com>
Date: Tue, 19 Feb 2002 14:52:24 -0800
James, even our comparatively "wimpy" cars can paste most motorcycles off the line at least from zero to sixty. But to paste those motorcycles at 3-digit speeds, that requires something we don't have
/html/ba-autox/2002-02/msg00244.html (16,061 bytes)

11. RE: Its official: The GT40 is a GO!!! (score: 1)
Author: Kevin Stevens <Kevin_Stevens@pursued-with.net>
Date: Tue, 19 Feb 2002 15:15:10 -0800 (PST)
Sounds a lot like an ACR Viper. KeS
/html/ba-autox/2002-02/msg00246.html (9,284 bytes)

12. RE: Its official: The GT40 is a GO!!! (score: 1)
Author: "Michael R. Clements" <mrclem@telocity.com>
Date: Tue, 19 Feb 2002 15:22:57 -0800
Sure does. It's great to see any company doing this, especially with a hand built aluminum overhead cam engine mounted so that you can hear the glorious high RPM V8 ripping growl coming from _behind_
/html/ba-autox/2002-02/msg00247.html (9,900 bytes)

13. Re: Its official: The GT40 is a GO!!! (score: 1)
Author: "Scot Zediker" <roadsterboy@earthlink.net>
Date: Tue, 19 Feb 2002 15:50:48 -0800
OSP - Obnoxious Starlets Prevail :-b Scot
/html/ba-autox/2002-02/msg00249.html (9,502 bytes)

14. Re: Its official: The GT40 is a GO!!! (score: 1)
Author: Ian Haddock <Streetvideo@mac.com>
Date: Tue, 19 Feb 2002 22:48:17 -0800
You mean the GT44? I sure think its odd that I'm 22 and would rather buy a 'real' GT40 replica than this new iteration. It will do wonders for the Ford US image though... and that is a very good thin
/html/ba-autox/2002-02/msg00254.html (14,644 bytes)

15. Re: Its official: The GT40 is a GO!!! (score: 1)
Author: James Creasy <black94pgt@pacbell.net>
Date: Tue, 19 Feb 2002 23:42:59 -0800
i agree with you ian. ive posted some short movies with GT40s (and my recent motor work jpgs you can ignore) http://thevenom.net/gt40/ the sounds in the one called charlott.avi just makes me drool. a
/html/ba-autox/2002-02/msg00256.html (16,008 bytes)

16. Re: Its official: The GT40 is a GO!!! (score: 1)
Author: "Donald R McKenna" <donbarbmckenna@earthlink.net>
Date: Wed, 20 Feb 2002 09:30:02 -0800
Have experienced that "ripping growl" or, in my case, rip-roaring-horror as a 400+ HP 327 spit a rod at around 6500 while I was sitting 15" ahead of it with only a 1/4" fiberglass cover between me an
/html/ba-autox/2002-02/msg00258.html (9,221 bytes)

17. RE: Its official: The GT40 is a GO!!! (score: 1)
Author: "Michael R. Clements" <mrclem@telocity.com>
Date: Wed, 20 Feb 2002 09:45:36 -0800
Trip to the market at 6500 RPM? --Original Message-- From: Donald R McKenna [mailto:donbarbmckenna@earthlink.net] Sent: Wednesday, February 20, 2002 09:30 To: Michael R. Clements; Kevin_Stevens@pursu
/html/ba-autox/2002-02/msg00259.html (9,428 bytes)

18. Re: Its official: The GT40 is a GO!!! (score: 1)
Author: "Scot Zediker" <roadsterboy@earthlink.net>
Date: Wed, 20 Feb 2002 16:29:00 -0800
-- Original Message -- From: "Michael R. Clements" <mrclem@telocity.com> To: "Donald R McKenna" <donbarbmckenna@earthlink.net>; "Michael R. Clements" <mrclem@telocity.com>; <Kevin_Stevens@pursued-wit
/html/ba-autox/2002-02/msg00264.html (9,036 bytes)

19. RE: Its official: The GT40 is a GO!!! (score: 1)
Author: "Michael R. Clements" <mrclem@telocity.com>
Date: Wed, 20 Feb 2002 17:01:47 -0800
I was struck by the humor of imagining how many people blow up the engine at the track, tow the car to the local grocery store, then call the dealer for warranty service 'cuz the engine "split a rod"
/html/ba-autox/2002-02/msg00267.html (9,943 bytes)

20. RE: Its official: The GT40 is a GO!!! (score: 1)
Author: Scott_Higashi@el.nec.com
Date: Wed, 20 Feb 2002 17:29:11 -0800
It's more correctly "Threw a Rod"... It refers to the connecting rod and how when it snaps it tends to blow out the side of the block and "throw" parts everywhere... -Scott "Michael R. Clements" To:
/html/ba-autox/2002-02/msg00271.html (11,597 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu