Mail Archive Search: <+from:garryj@localnet.com>

Results:

References: [ +from:garryj@localnet.com: 37 ]

Total 37 documents matching your query.

1. Re: Clutch Replacement (score: 1): Author: Jim and Rose Ann <garryj@localnet.com>; Date: Tue, 28 Sep 2004 08:33:33 -0400; Sorry about that. I thought I replied a while ago but it must not have gone through. What I wrote was that I used the F3 clutch in my prior FF and I was not happy with it. The thing is an on/off swit; /html/autox-cm/2004-09/msg00003.html (8,168 bytes)
2. Calling Don Elzinga (score: 1): Author: <garryj@localnet.com>; Date: Thu, 8 Jul 2004 09:52:02 -0400 (EDT); Hi Don, I'd like to get in touch with you. Please send me an email at garryj@localnet.com Thanks, Jim Garry /// unsubscribe/change address requests to majordomo@autox.team.net or try /// http://www.t; /html/autox-cm/2004-07/msg00003.html (6,474 bytes)
3. Re: CM F2000 (score: 1): Author: Jim and Rose Ann <garryj@localnet.com>; Date: Thu, 01 Jan 2004 14:36:25 -0500; So Chuck, you say that you are sorry if I took it as an insult. No need to apologize FOR me. You don't even need to apologize TO me (which your statement below did not do) or to all the other C Mod c; /html/autox-cm/2004-01/msg00004.html (11,516 bytes)
4. Dave Weitzenhof, Re: CM F2000 (score: 1): Author: Jim and Rose Ann <garryj@localnet.com>; Date: Fri, 02 Jan 2004 14:18:32 -0500; Hello all, Sorry to add another email to this but ... A few days ago I contacted Dave Weitzenhof about the FC vs FF performance issue. As you probably all know, Dave is a many time Runoffs Champion a; /html/autox-cm/2004-01/msg00012.html (9,593 bytes)
5. Re: FF2000 performance analysis (score: 1): Author: Jim and Rose Ann <garryj@localnet.com>; Date: Sun, 04 Jan 2004 11:08:06 -0500; Well .... all cars have a class in Solo II. It's just that some are competitively classed and other aren't. The vast majority of uncompetitively classed cars are in those straits because they would b; /html/autox-cm/2004-01/msg00014.html (9,077 bytes)
6. Re: Going Past the FF2000 performance analysis (score: 1): Author: Jim and Rose Ann <garryj@localnet.com>; Date: Sun, 04 Jan 2004 19:41:54 -0500; This is all very interesting but it's extremely important to stop and ask some questions .... what is it we are trying to do and what is the goal and what is broken that we are trying to fix? The onl; /html/autox-cm/2004-01/msg00024.html (8,833 bytes)
7. race car handling (score: 1): Author: Jim and Rose Ann <garryj@localnet.com>; Date: Mon, 12 Jan 2004 20:50:52 -0500; Greetings all, Here's something you may be interested in. ICP is holding two seminars this winter in the northeast. The first is Feb 7-8 in Westborourgh, Massachusetts. Westborough is between Worcest; /html/autox-cm/2004-01/msg00025.html (7,967 bytes)
8. Re: Back again? (score: 1): Author: Jim and Rose Ann <garryj@localnet.com>; Date: Wed, 21 Jan 2004 19:35:07 -0500; "No time"!?!? Don't say THAT. He'll never be competitive if he gets DNFs. <G> I think I ought to explain. Craig has been threatening to come out to events for years. He always tells me "I'll be out t; /html/autox-cm/2004-01/msg00028.html (7,389 bytes)
9. To SEB (score: 1): Author: garryj@localnet.com; Date: Fri, 05 Dec 2003 15:45:46 -0500; Regarding your request for input about moving the FF2000 to CM at a weight of 1310 lbs. and without wings. What's the problem, does the SEB have too much spare time on its hands? Looking around for a; /html/autox-cm/2003-12/msg00001.html (7,748 bytes)
10. Re: CM F2000 (score: 1): Author: j <garryj@localnet.com>; Date: Mon, 29 Dec 2003 16:16:01 -0500; Actually, the place for FF2000 is B Mod. The FA cars are very expensive to buy, develop, and maintain. The sportsracers and big formula cars are the ones that need to be restricted in some way to all; /html/autox-cm/2003-12/msg00035.html (13,124 bytes)
11. Re: CM F2000 (score: 1): Author: j <garryj@localnet.com>; Date: Mon, 29 Dec 2003 20:47:12 -0500; Hmmmm. I believe you are correct. So perhaps he shouldn't be hawking the FF2000 for CM either. /// unsubscribe/change address requests to majordomo@autox.team.net or try /// http://www.team.net/mailm; /html/autox-cm/2003-12/msg00038.html (14,124 bytes)
12. Re: CM F2000 (score: 1): Author: j <garryj@localnet.com>; Date: Mon, 29 Dec 2003 20:56:26 -0500; If there is unrest in BM, then deal with it in that class. Don't take a successful class like CM and quite probably damage it by moving a car with lots more HP and torque and bigger wheels and stiffe; /html/autox-cm/2003-12/msg00039.html (10,020 bytes)
13. Re: CM F2000 (score: 1): Author: Jim and Rose Ann <garryj@localnet.com>; Date: Mon, 29 Dec 2003 21:11:04 -0500; FF2000 has lots more HP and torque, wider wheels. The car gets up and goes alot faster than a 1600. And it was about a hundred years ago that people were saying that wings at Solo II speeds meant not; /html/autox-cm/2003-12/msg00040.html (9,644 bytes)
14. Re: CM F2000 (score: 1): Author: Jim and Rose Ann <garryj@localnet.com>; Date: Mon, 29 Dec 2003 21:13:19 -0500; Well stated Andy. Jim /// unsubscribe/change address requests to majordomo@autox.team.net or try /// http://www.team.net/mailman/listinfo /// Archives at http://www.team.net/archive/autox-cm; /html/autox-cm/2003-12/msg00041.html (9,055 bytes)
15. Re: CM F2000 (score: 1): Author: Jim and Rose Ann <garryj@localnet.com>; Date: Mon, 29 Dec 2003 21:23:40 -0500; I very strongly disagree with Chuck. Josh is correct. You can count on one hand the number of cross-over competitors between SII and RR. I am signed onto the FF1600/2000 discussion site. It shows tha; /html/autox-cm/2003-12/msg00042.html (9,434 bytes)
16. Re: CM F2000 (score: 1): Author: Jim and Rose Ann <garryj@localnet.com>; Date: Tue, 30 Dec 2003 12:24:23 -0500; And do you think that is because the rules inhibit it or is it because there simply is not enough interest in cross over? /// unsubscribe/change address requests to majordomo@autox.team.net or try //; /html/autox-cm/2003-12/msg00048.html (8,617 bytes)
17. Re: CM F2000 (score: 1): Author: Jim and Rose Ann <garryj@localnet.com>; Date: Tue, 30 Dec 2003 12:29:23 -0500; Proposing that anything other than a kart go into F125 clearly indicates a lack of understanding about vehicle dynamics and classing. It is beginning to look alot like the F2000 idea is coming from o; /html/autox-cm/2003-12/msg00049.html (9,627 bytes)
18. Re: CM F2000 (score: 1): Author: Jim and Rose Ann <garryj@localnet.com>; Date: Tue, 30 Dec 2003 16:07:26 -0500; Well, well .... Chuck and I are in agreement on something. But what I'm not clear on is if you are shooting for cross over. Some earlier emails appeared to say that was at least one goal of your FF20; /html/autox-cm/2003-12/msg00059.html (10,743 bytes)
19. Re: F2000 to CM (score: 1): Author: Jim and Rose Ann <garryj@localnet.com>; Date: Tue, 30 Dec 2003 18:46:54 -0500; It belongs in BM. Not all cars can be competitively classed. As for looking to the future, I don't see the same issues and timeline that you see Tommy. There is no shortage of FF's right now and they; /html/autox-cm/2003-12/msg00061.html (6,732 bytes)
20. Re: CM F2000 (score: 1): Author: Jim and Rose Ann <garryj@localnet.com>; Date: Tue, 30 Dec 2003 19:25:59 -0500; Well, looks like Josh wrote what I was going to write, and he did it in a much more pithy way. So I'll just keep it brief by seconding his thoughts. Jim /// unsubscribe/change address requests to maj; /html/autox-cm/2003-12/msg00062.html (8,640 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 20
Page: [1] [2]