Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Vehicle\s+Identification\s+Proposal\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Vehicle\s+Identification\s+Proposal\s*$/: 23 ]

Total 23 documents matching your query.

1. Re: Vehicle Identification Proposal (score: 1): Author: "Phil Ethier" <pethier@isd.net>; Date: Sun, 4 May 2003 19:36:56 -0500; Self-solving problem for Met Council. No seatbelts, no entry. No karts. No problem. Phil Ethier West Side Saint Paul Minnesota USA 1970 Lotus Europa 65/2597, 1992 Saturn SL2, 1986 Suburban, 1962 TR4; /html/autox/2003-05/msg00027.html (7,340 bytes)
2. Re: Vehicle Identification Proposal (score: 1): Author: PbPied@aol.com; Date: Mon, 5 May 2003 01:37:08 EDT; Installing a frame-attached seat belt would be all too easy in my shifter kart. I think the council's rule requiring a roll-bar for all purpose built competition machines or open vehicles using non-; /html/autox/2003-05/msg00029.html (9,289 bytes)
3. Re: Vehicle Identification Proposal (score: 1): Author: pethier@isd.net; Date: Mon, 5 May 2003 16:50:49 -0500; I think some roll-over protection for karts would be a good thing. One of my friends broke his arm in a kart rollover at an SCCA kart school in Shakopee Minnesota. It was an aside, suggested by the; /html/autox/2003-05/msg00035.html (9,545 bytes)
4. Vehicle Identification Proposal (score: 1): Author: Craig & Cynthia Naylor <magazine@pacbell.net>; Date: Thu, 24 Apr 2003 10:54:43 -0700; I haven't seen any postings regarding this subject yet, and was a little surprised so I thought I would post the letter I sent to the SEB. seb@scca.com I understand the need to make changes to the ru; /html/autox/2003-04/msg00260.html (10,064 bytes)
5. Re: Vehicle Identification Proposal (score: 1): Author: "Rocky Entriken" <rocky@tri.net>; Date: Thu, 24 Apr 2003 16:18:30 -0500; Single color is good. Matching typeface of the class letters to the numbers is well nigh impossible and largely unnecessary. Wonder what they'd do with mine? I designed the numeral "4" on my car myse; /html/autox/2003-04/msg00263.html (16,818 bytes)
6. Re: Vehicle Identification Proposal (score: 1): Author: John Lieberman <jlieberman@sport.rr.com>; Date: Thu, 24 Apr 2003 18:37:09 -0500; I dare ANYBODY to challenge the size and font of THESE numbers and class letters!!! 8<{) http://www.miniownersoftexas.com/t1_lieberman.jpg John (Old Fartz & TLS #37) Lieberman /// unsubscribe/change; /html/autox/2003-04/msg00266.html (8,401 bytes)
7. Re: Vehicle Identification Proposal (score: 1): Author: John Lieberman <jlieberman@sport.rr.com>; Date: Thu, 24 Apr 2003 19:09:25 -0500; Aux contraire, my friend! Those numbers are 12" tall with a 3" stroke!!! 8<{) They're Helvetica Bold font. John (Old Fartz & TLS #37) Lieberman /// unsubscribe/change address requests to majordomo@au; /html/autox/2003-04/msg00267.html (8,379 bytes)
8. Re: Vehicle Identification Proposal (score: 1): Author: "Rick Brown" <free2000@quixnet.net>; Date: Thu, 24 Apr 2003 17:17:23 -0700; While I don't have a problem with the better defined size rules, I don't care for the "single color" part of it. Sure some color combos could be bad but you can have that with a single color dependin; /html/autox/2003-04/msg00268.html (8,926 bytes)
9. Re: Vehicle Identification Proposal (score: 1): Author: John Lieberman <jlieberman@sport.rr.com>; Date: Thu, 24 Apr 2003 19:35:15 -0500; Then we get into a WHOLE different ball of wax, Pat!!! 8<{) The obvious answer is to make those numbers and letters as big as you possibly can - and as visible as possible - given the amount of space; /html/autox/2003-04/msg00269.html (8,744 bytes)
10. Re: Vehicle Identification Proposal (score: 1): Author: Smokerbros@aol.com; Date: Fri, 25 Apr 2003 00:58:57 EDT; The problem is writing a rule that allows your creative (and legible) side, but disallows someone else's creatively illegible side. Charlie /// unsubscribe/change address requests to majordomo@autox.; /html/autox/2003-04/msg00270.html (9,320 bytes)
11. Re: Vehicle Identification Proposal (score: 1): Author: "Rocky Entriken" <rocky@tri.net>; Date: Fri, 25 Apr 2003 00:29:16 -0500; First off, Rick, I would have to say the numbers in your example are excellent. Yes, good contrast, easy to read, even at speed. The black outline helps a lot too. That said, the next guy who comes u; /html/autox/2003-04/msg00271.html (10,821 bytes)
12. Re: Vehicle Identification Proposal (score: 1): Author: Andrew Schmiechen <aschmiechen@discovercolor.com>; Date: Fri, 25 Apr 2003 08:40:47 -0500; I've also got to weigh in on this. I use a number panel on my red car. The panel back ground is white, with a .25" black border. This makes the numbers on the panel black on white. It meets the curre; /html/autox/2003-04/msg00272.html (9,392 bytes)
13. Re: Vehicle Identification Proposal (score: 1): Author: PbPied@aol.com; Date: Fri, 25 Apr 2003 13:54:17 EDT; Generally speaking, karts should not be a problem, IF they are numbered according to the karting rules used worldwide. They call for numbers 6" tall with a 1" stroke. Numbers must also appear on bot; /html/autox/2003-04/msg00277.html (10,476 bytes)
14. Re: Vehicle Identification Proposal (score: 1): Author: John Lieberman <jlieberman@sport.rr.com>; Date: Fri, 25 Apr 2003 18:53:05 -0500; Good points, Alan! As you know, I wrote the F-125 class for SportsCar at last year's Nationals. Thursday wasn't all that difficult. But on Friday, when people started swapping karts due to mechanical; /html/autox/2003-04/msg00280.html (10,945 bytes)
15. Re: Vehicle Identification Proposal (score: 1): Author: "David W. James" <vnend@adelphia.net>; Date: Sat, 26 Apr 2003 09:52:46 -0400; While I will agree that red on black (and the reverse) is not good contrast in general, I have to disagree with this statement. "Red" covers a lot of ground; from somewhere north of 'pink' to crimson; /html/autox/2003-04/msg00281.html (10,853 bytes)
16. Re: Vehicle Identification Proposal (score: 1): Author: "David W. James" <vnend@adelphia.net>; Date: Sat, 26 Apr 2003 13:33:49 -0400; That should depend on how you do it; if you shoot with a red/orange filter then the red should show up very light; if you shoot with a blue or green filter it will turn out darker, if not completely; /html/autox/2003-04/msg00282.html (10,229 bytes)
17. Re: Vehicle Identification Proposal (score: 1): Author: "Phil Ethier" <pethier@isd.net>; Date: Sun, 27 Apr 2003 22:54:09 -0500; Size and font are great. Color sucks. Should be black on white. Phil Ethier West Side Saint Paul Minnesota USA 1970 Lotus Europa 65/2597, 1992 Saturn SL2, 1986 Suburban, 1962 TR4 CT2846L pethier@isd; /html/autox/2003-04/msg00291.html (9,072 bytes)
18. Re: Vehicle Identification Proposal (score: 1): Author: "Eric Linnhoff" <knuckledragger@kcweb.net>; Date: Mon, 28 Apr 2003 08:12:05 -0400; -- Original Message -- == But Phil, pink is so....John. ;^) Or is that fuchsia? Eric /// unsubscribe/change address requests to majordomo@autox.team.net or try /// http://www.team.net/mailman/listinf; /html/autox/2003-04/msg00295.html (8,887 bytes)
19. Re: Vehicle Identification Proposal (score: 1): Author: John Lieberman <jlieberman@sport.rr.com>; Date: Mon, 28 Apr 2003 19:16:29 -0500; OK, Guys! Knock it off. You all know as well as I do that there's nothing effeminate about me. I'm a 54-year-old "dirty old man" who still loves to love the ladies. Actually, my original numbers WERE; /html/autox/2003-04/msg00304.html (10,246 bytes)
20. Re: Vehicle Identification Proposal (score: 1): Author: "Rocky Entriken" <rocky@tri.net>; Date: Tue, 29 Apr 2003 15:19:05 -0500; Jr. karts. Heh heh. Actually, a self-solving problem because of the procedures of running Jr. Karts. Numbers may look similar, but when they are the only thing allowed to move it is easy to distingu; /html/autox/2003-04/msg00333.html (8,592 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 20
Page: [1] [2]