Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Upgraded\s+brake\s+lines\.\.\.\.HS\s+legal\?\?\s*$/: 15 ]

Total 15 documents matching your query.

1. Upgraded brake lines....HS legal?? (score: 1)
Author: Rick Shank <rickshank@banklogic.net>
Date: Tue, 29 May 2001 11:26:51 -0400 (EDT)
Can I switch to a stainless steel line (such as a Neuspeed brake line) for my HS 89 Civic SI? I'm getting a leak from one of my lines, and I figured if I was going to replace them, I'd go w/ the nylo
/html/autox/2001-05/msg00528.html (7,840 bytes)

2. Re: Upgraded brake lines....HS legal?? (score: 1)
Author: "Joe Delio" <justjoe13es@hotmail.com>
Date: Tue, 29 May 2001 11:01:42 -0500
Now, maybe I understand it incorrectly (I am sure that I would hear it but as long as the car is OLDER than 6 years, then it is LEGAL to replace broken/leaking brake lines with Stainless Steel braide
/html/autox/2001-05/msg00529.html (8,458 bytes)

3. Re: Upgraded brake lines....HS legal?? (score: 1)
Author: "Kevin Stevens" <Kevin_Stevens@pursued-with.net>
Date: Tue, 29 May 2001 09:16:39 -0700
Yes, you understand it incorrectly. KeS
/html/autox/2001-05/msg00530.html (8,412 bytes)

4. RE: Upgraded brake lines....HS legal?? (score: 1)
Author: "Linnhoff, Eric" <elinnhoff@smmc.saint-lukes.org>
Date: Tue, 29 May 2001 11:27:30 -0500
The applicable rule is: "13.6 Brakes B. Substitution of clutch and brake hydraulic lines with solid metal or braided metal is allowed on all cars manufactured before model year 1992." And the "model
/html/autox/2001-05/msg00531.html (8,369 bytes)

5. RE: Upgraded brake lines....HS legal?? (score: 1)
Author: "Dan Timko" <dtimko@cc.gatech.edu>
Date: Tue, 29 May 2001 12:32:54 -0400
Boy, it sure would be nice if someone would correct him then, instead of just telling him he's incorrect. So does that mean it is illegal in all cases, Kevin? Dan Timko 62 STS 00 Celica GTS Yes, you
/html/autox/2001-05/msg00532.html (9,060 bytes)

6. Re: Upgraded brake lines....HS legal?? (score: 1)
Author: "Jay Mitchell" <jemitchell@compuserve.com>
Date: Tue, 29 May 2001 11:38:44 -0500
metal or year 1992." Correct. calendar year. Incorrect. 1992 is the last model year for which this is allowed, and the year remains the same. Jay
/html/autox/2001-05/msg00534.html (8,601 bytes)

7. RE: Upgraded brake lines....HS legal?? (score: 1)
Author: "Linnhoff, Eric" <elinnhoff@smmc.saint-lukes.org>
Date: Tue, 29 May 2001 11:44:19 -0500
calendar year. Incorrect. 1992 is the last model year for which this is allowed, and the year remains the same. == Sorry, I could've sworn that I saw a 1991 cutoff in last year's rule book. But then
/html/autox/2001-05/msg00535.html (8,712 bytes)

8. Re: Upgraded brake lines....HS legal?? (score: 1)
Author: "Jay Mitchell" <jemitchell@compuserve.com>
Date: Tue, 29 May 2001 12:06:25 -0500
making this Yes. It's not stock. This change occurred during the same rules revision in which engine balancing, .040" overbores, and port matching were disallowed in Stock. Earlier cars were grandfat
/html/autox/2001-05/msg00537.html (9,323 bytes)

9. RE: Upgraded brake lines....HS legal?? (score: 1)
Author: "Linnhoff, Eric" <elinnhoff@smmc.saint-lukes.org>
Date: Tue, 29 May 2001 12:33:56 -0500
making this Yes. It's not stock. == I should know better than this, but.........Neither are different front sway bars, or bushings, shocks, or DOT race tires, or aftermarket wheels, or aftermarket b
/html/autox/2001-05/msg00538.html (9,163 bytes)

10. RE: Upgraded brake lines....HS legal?? (score: 1)
Author: <Kevin_Stevens@pursued-with.net>
Date: Tue, 29 May 2001 11:13:20 -0700 (PDT)
Yes, a good reason would be the goal of having Stock class cars with as few aftermarket modifications as possible. If you're telling me that *new* stock brake lines for a 1991 car are significantly l
/html/autox/2001-05/msg00539.html (8,966 bytes)

11. Re: Upgraded brake lines....HS legal?? (score: 1)
Author: "David Hedderick" <davebs14@yahoo.com>
Date: Tue, 29 May 2001 21:57:15 -0500
So does this mean like for example I could have ran SS braided brake lines on my 1992 CS Miata? David Hedderick NetZero Platinum No Banner Ads and Unlimited Access Sign Up Today - Only $9.95 per mont
/html/autox/2001-05/msg00555.html (9,143 bytes)

12. Re: Upgraded brake lines....HS legal?? (score: 1)
Author: Smokerbros@aol.com
Date: Tue, 29 May 2001 23:08:18 EDT
You'll have to excuse Kevin, he's a natural born smart-ass. Since he doesn't autocross anymore, he's gotten cranky(er.) Yes, I know that's spelled incorrectly, KeS... :-) CHD
/html/autox/2001-05/msg00557.html (8,427 bytes)

13. Re: Upgraded brake lines....HS legal?? (score: 1)
Author: "Phil Ethier" <pethier@isd.net>
Date: Tue, 29 May 2001 22:45:34 -0500
Yes. Phil Ethier Saint Paul Minnesota USA 1970 Lotus Europa, 1992 Saturn SL2, 1986 Suburban, 1962 Triumph TR4 CT2846L LOON, MAC pethier@isd.net http://www.mnautox.com/
/html/autox/2001-05/msg00560.html (8,254 bytes)

14. Re: Upgraded brake lines....HS legal?? (score: 1)
Author: "Kevin Stevens" <Kevin_Stevens@pursued-with.net>
Date: Wed, 30 May 2001 01:10:39 -0700
Sorry, sorry - actually I dashed off to work after replying to Eric and then couldn't get back into my home machine with the manual on it, even to send mail. Bleh. As for you, Chuckster - if you'd pu
/html/autox/2001-05/msg00563.html (9,123 bytes)

15. Re: Upgraded brake lines....HS legal?? (score: 1)
Author: Smokerbros@aol.com
Date: Wed, 30 May 2001 09:30:00 EDT
And then again, perhaps not! CHD
/html/autox/2001-05/msg00565.html (7,895 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 15
Page: [1]
This search system is powered by Namazu