Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Supplemental\s+classes\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Supplemental\s+classes\s*$/: 37 ]

Total 37 documents matching your query.

21. Re: Supplemental classes (score: 1): Author: "Rocky Entriken" <rocky@tri.net>; Date: Tue, 24 Sep 2002 14:57:29 -0500; a lot of good thoughts there. You have not dissuaded me one bit, but you have given me some more good stuff to chew on. the Sport Truck never made numbers. Not even close. One or two. I like F/SAE a; /html/autox/2002-09/msg00369.html (13,836 bytes)
22. Re: Supplemental classes (score: 1): Author: dg50@daimlerchrysler.com; Date: Tue, 24 Sep 2002 16:30:57 -0400; More than that. The class needs to be able to generate the kinds of numbers that can justify creating it in the first place. We have too many classes as it sits. Unless a new class is pulling in LAR; /html/autox/2002-09/msg00372.html (12,477 bytes)
23. Re: Supplemental classes (score: 1): Author: "Rocky Entriken" <rocky@tri.net>; Date: Tue, 24 Sep 2002 17:46:39 -0500; Well we are not all that far apart on your reply this time. Conceptually I agree with most of what you say. I do think your numbers a little stiff, to the point of being unrealistic. Not when 21 of 3; /html/autox/2002-09/msg00381.html (17,788 bytes)
24. Re: Supplemental classes (score: 1): Author: TeamZ06@aol.com; Date: Tue, 24 Sep 2002 19:56:47 EDT; In other words, why don't we make all the rules superfluous and subject to change anytime somebody wants them to suit their own way. The fact that the entire podium was usurped by non-SM2 vehicles, r; /html/autox/2002-09/msg00391.html (10,194 bytes)
25. Re: Supplemental classes (score: 1): Author: "Mark J. Andy" <marka@telerama.com>; Date: Tue, 24 Sep 2002 23:03:07 -0400 (EDT); Well, we know that CP is soft. That's why you see all those bottom feeding class hoppers in the class, right? The only thing I can "contribute" seriously to this thread is that I think Dennis is ove; /html/autox/2002-09/msg00396.html (9,421 bytes)
26. Re: Supplemental classes (score: 1): Author: Dick Rasmussen <rasmussend@mindspring.com>; Date: Tue, 24 Sep 2002 23:14:48 -0400; Can't happen in CM. Got to have either a Formula Ford or a Sports 2000.:-) Similar in FM just different cars. Probably not in AM or BM or either. Dick Rasmussen CM 85 85 Van Diemen FF /// unsubscribe; /html/autox/2002-09/msg00397.html (9,038 bytes)
27. Re: Supplemental classes (score: 1): Author: "Bruce Wentzel" <greendotracing@netzero.net>; Date: Wed, 25 Sep 2002 09:34:12 -0400; the Sorry Mark, but you've made some assumptions that are not correct. Due to what I consider to be a poor decision by the SEB about differential carrier bushings affecting C4 Corvettes, my car was; /html/autox/2002-09/msg00407.html (9,692 bytes)
28. Re: Supplemental classes (score: 1): Author: "Bruce Wentzel" <greendotracing@netzero.net>; Date: Wed, 25 Sep 2002 09:44:57 -0400; Unlimited Long Distance only $29.95/ month! /// unsubscribe/change address requests to majordomo@autox.team.net or try /// http://www.team.net/mailman/listinfo /// Partial archives at http://www.team; /html/autox/2002-09/msg00410.html (9,381 bytes)
29. Re: Supplemental classes (score: 1): Author: Bob Pariza <bpariza@yahoo.com>; Date: Wed, 25 Sep 2002 06:49:32 -0700 (PDT); Perhaps someone can explain something to me. I've been told that you can bump yourself "up" a class at any time, just not down. In my case, when I started playing this game, the local region had a no; /html/autox/2002-09/msg00411.html (10,925 bytes)
30. Re: Supplemental classes (score: 1): Author: dg50@daimlerchrysler.com; Date: Wed, 25 Sep 2002 10:27:36 -0400; to your But that's exactly the point. In a world with too many classes as it is, the creation of a new class must address a problem or hole in the existing class structure that is _so_ big that fixi; /html/autox/2002-09/msg00412.html (12,086 bytes)
31. Re: Supplemental classes (score: 1): Author: "Brad Cox" <COXB@tmfhs.org>; Date: Wed, 25 Sep 2002 10:05:11 -0500; I know this has probably been thought of and thouroughly hashed over by people who know a lot more than I, but how about basing "class viability" on numbers generated from National Tours rather than; /html/autox/2002-09/msg00414.html (8,432 bytes)
32. Re: Supplemental classes (score: 1): Author: Ben Thatcher <bthatch@juno.com>; Date: Wed, 25 Sep 2002 11:20:39 -0400; Bruce, thanks for setting Mr. Sipe straight. I wanted to talk about your car, but figured that was your place to mention it. Yes, First and Third places in SM2 open were ASP cars. In fact, 4 of the 7; /html/autox/2002-09/msg00420.html (10,140 bytes)
33. Re: Supplemental classes (score: 1): Author: dg50@daimlerchrysler.com; Date: Wed, 25 Sep 2002 13:21:15 -0400; Different problem. CP is soft only insofar as nobody is making full use of all that the rules provide them with. There is thus a window of opportunity for someone to build a "proper" car and stomp th; /html/autox/2002-09/msg00428.html (8,946 bytes)
34. Re: Supplemental classes (score: 1): Author: "Rocky Entriken" <rocky@tri.net>; Date: Wed, 25 Sep 2002 16:58:36 -0500; FWIW, we disagree on whether or not there are "too many" classes, because that comes down to a debate over the definition of "too many." But I do not think it needs to be part of a debate on whether; /html/autox/2002-09/msg00438.html (9,059 bytes)
35. Re: Supplemental classes (score: 1): Author: Kevin Stevens <Kevin_Stevens@pursued-with.net>; Date: Sat, 28 Sep 2002 19:40:11 -0700; BTW, unless your region has supplemental rules to that effect, this is a totally incorrect interpretation of the bumping rules. KeS /// unsubscribe/change address requests to majordomo@autox.team.net; /html/autox/2002-09/msg00484.html (8,351 bytes)
36. Re: Supplemental classes (score: 1): Author: Bob Pariza <bpariza@yahoo.com>; Date: Mon, 30 Sep 2002 10:30:49 -0700 (PDT); BTW, unless your region has supplemental rules to that effect, this is a totally incorrect interpretation of the bumping rules. KeS New DSL Internet Access from SBC & Yahoo! /// unsubscribe/change ad; /html/autox/2002-09/msg00507.html (8,472 bytes)
37. Re: Supplemental classes (score: 1): Author: "Mark J. Andy" <marka@telerama.com>; Date: Mon, 30 Sep 2002 13:43:10 -0400 (EDT); No, he's saying that you can't run the car in SS vs. BS (or ESP) as it was never classed there (assuming BS is the proper stock class location for an SS Camaro). For most cars, you get to pick eithe; /html/autox/2002-09/msg00508.html (8,927 bytes)

Current List: 21 - 37
Page: [1] [2]